I meant that your post was indeed inappropriate for the subject matter.
The Holy Father said: “St. Peter Canisius is a reminder that preaching the Gospel is effective only if the preacher has a personal relationship with Christ, is united with the church and “lives a morally coherent life,” the pope said.”
Why do you have a problem with “a personal relationship with Christ?” Or is it being united with the church and living a morally coherent life?
My comments are quite appropriate to subject matter.
“The Holy Father said: “St. Peter Canisius is a reminder that preaching the Gospel is effective only if the preacher has a personal relationship with Christ, is united with the church and “lives a morally coherent life,” the pope said.”
A thousand plus years of doing just the opposite may have escaped your notice. So it strikes me as a bit more than ironic that you should ask,
“Why do you have a problem with “a personal relationship with Christ?” Or is it being united with the church and living a morally coherent life?”