Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Non-Christian Education Is Sin, Spiritual Child Abuse
American Vision ^ | Feb. 4, 2011 | John Lofton

Posted on 02/05/2011 5:41:53 AM PST by RJR_fan

To put a child through 15,000 hours of Godless, Christless, Holy Spiritless, no-Bible, non-Christian “education” (K through 12) is sin and ignores what has been said by many of the greatest teachers of the Reformed faith. A Godless “education” is not bringing children up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. Such an “education” is not “for the glory of God” (1 Corinthians 10:31) — or which we are commanded to do everything. ...

Here's a link to the rest of this page, rich in quotes from such luminaries as


TOPICS: History; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: apostasy; educrats; homeschooling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: verdugo

>>I don’t think the USA would look any different if it was say 95% American Indian

It would probably depend if those American Indians were converted to orthodox Christianity vs. a syncretized mix of Catholicism and indigenous beliefs.


61 posted on 02/06/2011 3:27:08 PM PST by TheDingoAteMyBaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: TheDingoAteMyBaby
To correct your posting and make it precise. There is no such religion as Orthodox Christianity. There is no religion called Christianity.

On the other hand, there is a religion called Catholic.

As far as “syncretized mix of Catholicism and indigenous beliefs” - are not those those Indian “Catholics” no different than the CINO’s today, the cafeteria “Catholics”? Moreover, the Indians picking and choosing and adding what they want, is different than the Protestants, each one his own DIY church, pope, and god.

The syncretized Indian “Catholics”, the CINO “Catholics”, and the DIY YOPIOS Protestants are all the same thing. They could all triple date together! In fact they do, it's called the ecumenistic movement.

62 posted on 02/07/2011 8:21:16 AM PST by verdugo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: TheDingoAteMyBaby
To correct your posting and make it precise. There is no such religion as Orthodox Christianity. There is no religion called Christianity.

On the other hand, there is a religion called Catholic.

As far as “syncretized mix of Catholicism and indigenous beliefs” - are not those those Indian “Catholics” no different than the CINO’s today, the cafeteria “Catholics”? Moreover, the Indians picking and choosing and adding what they want, is no different than the Protestants, each one his own DIY church, pope, and god.

The syncretized Indian “Catholics”, the CINO “Catholics”, and the DIY YOPIOS Protestants are all the same thing. They could all triple date together! In fact they do, it's called the ecumenistic movement.

63 posted on 02/07/2011 8:22:22 AM PST by verdugo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib; RJR_fan

I was sexually, emotionally, and physically abused at not one, but two “Christian” schools. I was afraid to tell my parents because if the teacher spanked me at school, I’d get spanked at home. But what if the teacher was a man, who pulled down my underwear and fondled me before putting me over his lap and spanking my bare bottom? That was one school, when I was 10-11. The other was when I was 16 and yet again, another male teacher pulled up my skirt and pulled down my underwear before paddling me with his bare hand. Two separate schools, two separate states.

Neither of my girls attended a Christian school. The thought of those bastards hiding behind their religion while abusing little girls sickens me.


64 posted on 02/07/2011 9:48:19 AM PST by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SoftballMominVA

Jesus said there is a special place in Hell for those who abuse the little ones in these ways. I do pray that you will find grace today, while not minimizing the heinous nature of your experiences.


65 posted on 02/07/2011 11:11:16 AM PST by RJR_fan (The press corpse is going through the final stages of Hopium withdrawal. That leg tingle is urine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: RJR_fan

I’m somewhat over it, but wary, always wary.


66 posted on 02/07/2011 11:39:24 AM PST by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: verdugo

You make me laugh with the big noses! Myself, my husband and both my girls have small noses (or so we’ve been told) however, my younger daughter LOVES big noses and prefers to date guys with very big noses. It’s her favorite feature on a man. So, she’d be happy to hear that she was going to grow up with a big nose!


67 posted on 02/07/2011 12:00:00 PM PST by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SoftballMominVA

re:my younger daughter LOVES big noses and prefers to date guys with very big noses

Correction: pronounced manly noses!


68 posted on 02/07/2011 12:46:32 PM PST by verdugo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: verdugo

I’ll be sure to refer to that feature in that way in the future!


69 posted on 02/07/2011 3:42:48 PM PST by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

Molech seems to be an allegory for collectivist government education. Wonder if Solomon established schools of higher learning, and it went south from there.

1 Kings 11:7 Then did Solomon build an high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab, in the hill that is before Jerusalem, and for Molech, the abomination of the children of Ammon.


70 posted on 02/07/2011 4:12:10 PM PST by Ezekiel (The Obama-nation began with the Inauguration of Desolation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Ezekiel
Molech seems to be an allegory for collectivist government education.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

It does. Yet...There are many beguiled Christians teaching in these government schools who surprisingly believe they are doing the Lord's work by feeding children a toxic stew of a godless worldview day after day.

It's like Christians working in an abortuary hoping to sneak in a little Christianity to the employees there. Or...It's like Christians working in Auschwitz hoping to reform it.

71 posted on 02/07/2011 5:04:30 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: dropkick; RJR_fan
I guess sending my kid to public education is a ticket to hell...

In today's age, it is surely prima facie evidence of child abuse. I think RJR has taken it to the next logical level of res ipsa loquitur and to which must come the question "What should a loving parent do?"

"...but blaspheming the body and blood of Christ with federal visionists, theonomist, and hyper-patriarchs is okay."

Fortunately I haven't fallen into that particular sin; nevertheless I don't think those teachings have earned the title "blasphemy" - that is usually reserved for gross irreverence of the things of God. Traditionally the test for this would be "Is this worth killing someone over?"

So before you irreverently toss around the term "blasphemy", ask, "Is the best way to deal with a federal visionist a proper stoning?"

72 posted on 02/08/2011 5:05:33 AM PST by The Theophilus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Coldwater Creek; RJR_fan
You should teach your child to say that the Jews didn’t kill Jesus, but that SIN did.

So you recommend breaking the Ninth Commandment. Why not? (sigh)

Who are the vinedressers in Mark 12? (Clue: Matt 23:30-39) Who were the people who demanded "His blood be on us, and on our children!" (Matthew 27:25) Who was Steven speaking of in Acts 7:52 "Which of the prophets have not your fathers persecuted? and they have slain them which sheweed before of the coming of the Just One; of whom ye have been no the betrayers and murderers Who was Paul speaking of in 1 Thess 2:15 "who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God"

Also, the Christology is quite a bit off on the "SIN killed Christ" charge. God is not nor has God ever been obligated to serve man. Jesus Christ being perfect was never under the penalty of sin, and thus was never under the penalty or threat of death. Rather, in John 10:15, we read that in obedience to the Father, our LORD voluntarily laid down His life.

So according to the Scriptures, the Jews are charged with the murder of Jesus Christ, and it was Obedience and Love that put Him there. Very much the opposite in which you prefer to be told.

73 posted on 02/08/2011 5:28:57 AM PST by The Theophilus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson