[xzins]

http://theantisblog.com/2008/11/23/joel-mcdurmons-sleight-of-hand-trick/ [snip] Gary DeMar, the president of American Vision, believes that the fullness of the Gentiles already came in 2,000 years ago... that Jesus Christ’s second advent occurred in A.D. 70... he also believes that the “great harlot” of Revelation 17 is the nation of Israel, which was divorced by God in A.D. 70. Whereas the “wife” of Revelation 19 is the Gospel church, which became married to Christ as the direct result of His putting away of Israel... Therefore, as Israel has been cast out by Jehovah, she may no longer look for any reconstitution of her national or religious privileges... if that isn’t replacement theology, I don’t know what is! Perhaps Joel McDurmon can explain whether he feels the same way. Does he agree that Israel was divorced and the church married in A.D. 70? If so, then he is a Replacement Theologian. There is no middle-ground on which he can stand. [unsnip]

The above #15 and also #16 are terrible indictments of preterism and replacement theology. Carried to their logical conclusion they would lead to pogroms against Jews.

I stand amazed at them.

[SunkenCiv]

Me too.

[topcat54]

The above #15 and also #16 are terrible indictments of preterism and replacement theology. Carried to their logical conclusion they would lead to pogroms against Jews.

The only thing this proves is that folks can get rather creative in their denunciations, esp. when they have no hard facts on their side. Both the indictment and the supporting evidence are false.

[Quix]

QUIXICATED REPEAT OF POST BEING PINGED TO:

INCREDIBLY OUTRAGEOUS UNBIBLICAL, UNHISTORICAL REPLACEMENTARIAN, PRETERIST, ET AL ASSERTIONS POST BEING PINGED TO:

http://theantisblog.com/2008/11/23/joel-mcdurmons-sleight-of-hand-trick/

[snip] Gary DeMar, the president of American Vision, believes

that the fullness of the Gentiles already came in 2,000 years ago... that Jesus Christ’s second advent occurred in A.D. 70...

he also believes that the “great harlot” of Revelation 17 is the nation of Israel, which was divorced by God in A.D. 70.

Whereas the “wife” of Revelation 19 is the Gospel church, which became married to Christ as the direct result of His putting away of Israel...

Therefore, as Israel has been cast out by Jehovah, she may no longer look for any reconstitution of her national or religious privileges...

if that isn’t replacement theology,
I don’t know what is!

Perhaps Joel McDurmon can explain whether he feels the same way. Does he agree that Israel was divorced and the church married in A.D. 70?

If so, then he is a Replacement Theologian. There is no middle-ground on which he can stand. [unsnip]

The above #15 and also #16 are terrible indictments of preterism and replacement theology. Carried to their logical conclusion they would lead to pogroms against Jews.

Words almost fail me.

IF ANY "Christian" thinks God Almighty is on the side of such idiocies from hell, such a person is in for an extremely "rude awakening."

The EVERLASTING promises of GOD ALMIGHTY to the blood children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob--THAT GOD ALMIGHTY himself says will be IN FORCE as long as THE SUN, MOON AND STARS EXIST--are more reliable than that the sun will rise tomorrow.

That includes all the land God promised to Abraham . . . Jacob . . . that HE HAS YET TO DELIVER to the children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

The idea that GOD'S FULL SALVATION FOR ISRAEL has been canceled, trashed is blasphemy. How could God be depended on for any shred of Salvation for anyone IF His EVERLASTING PROMISES TO ABRAHAM, ISAAC AND JACOB were not reliable?

MAY ALL REPLACEMENTARIANS, et al confess, repent and forsake such ideologies from hell.

[Alamo-Girl]

The above #15 and also #16 are terrible indictments of preterism and replacement theology. Carried to their logical conclusion they would lead to pogroms against Jews.

Indeed. What a horror.

[topcat54]

Gary DeMar, the president of American Vision, believes .. that Jesus Christ’s second advent occurred in A.D. 70.

This is a plain falsehood. It is libelous. It is also more proof of the desperation of lying futurists.

[caww]

Yep...a dastardly Replacment Theology stance indeed. And it’s completely vile.