This is a plain falsehood. It is libelous. It is also more proof of the desperation of lying futurists.
Since it seems that RJR_Fan has left the discussion, I’ll forward my question on to you, as the other defender of Preterism here.
If I understand this article correctly, the whole thrust is that because of Israel’s infidelity to God, Christ was sent to act as God’s Lawyer in establishing a case against Israel so that God could divorce Israel and marry the Church.
Am I correct in stating that this is what you believe? I’m trying to establish something here and I just need to know exactly what you believe.