Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Three Legged Stool of Salvation
Antinomianism and the New Covenant ^ | 1/25/2011 | Gart O'toole

Posted on 01/29/2011 7:06:07 PM PST by Benchim

Salvation has three legs supporting the entire doctrine. Leg 1: The first Leg on the Stool is Belief in Christ. Belief means to steadfastly trust in the fact-- that Jesus is the Son of God. The Greek word is pistevo. "For God so greatly loved the world that He gave up His only begotten Son, so that whoever believes in (trusts in, clings to, relies on) Him shall not perish but have eternal life" (John 3:16).

You will find nothing in the definition requiring "obedience" or "sinless" conduct . This is the foundation of antinomianism. John 6:28-29

Then they asked him, "What must we do to do the works God requires?" Jesus answered, "The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent."

LEG 2: The second leg is that Christ died and was resurrected to atone for your sins. This in imputed righteousness. Otherwise Christs suffering meant nothing. LEG 3: The third leg which stands the stool is Savlation is a gift- by the grace of God and not as a result of anything you do i.e. "works" except your belief in Christ as the son of God . Ephesians 2 8 For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— 9 not by works, so that no one can boast.


TOPICS: Evangelical Christian; Theology
KEYWORDS: freedom; grace; jesus; salvation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-180 next last
To: verga
Every single fundamentalist I ever met. Ask how many of them use the Pill or IUD's which are proven abortifacients. They chant outside the abortion mills, and then go home all smug and secure while they kill babies in the womb.

Reading some message board on the internet is no *proof* of anything.

How do you know every single "Fundamentalist" you know uses the Pill or IUD's?

Did every single one you know tell you that they do?

Or did you ask them?

Of the ones who haven't, how would you know what they do at home? You certainly can't live with each and everyone 24/7 to watch their every move.

121 posted on 01/30/2011 12:12:49 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; FatherofFive
And God promised to send a Savior to pay for their sin too. Really, you see in my Bible they left when they were saved, and Jesus came a long time AFTER they lost their salvation.

Argue, rant, rave, whine to your hearts content, Adam and Eve lost their salvation.

122 posted on 01/30/2011 12:16:18 PM PST by verga (I am not an apologist, I just play one on Television)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Every single Church stood united against contraception until the 1929 Lambeth conference. After that each of them except the CATHOLIC Church gradually accepted the use of them including the abortifacients. You want to deny the plain facts you go right ahead. You further document that trying to discuss issues of this nature is impossible to do with you.
123 posted on 01/30/2011 12:23:40 PM PST by verga (I am not an apologist, I just play one on Television)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

it’s not with the loss of salvation, otherwise, we wouldn’t still be considered sons. He uses whatever means is necessary, but God does not hold us under the Law anymore so that *If you do thus, this will happen to you*.

God disciplines His own....

Hebrews 12:3-11

Consider him who endured from sinners such hostility against himself, so that you may not grow weary or fainthearted. In your struggle against sin you have not yet resisted to the point of shedding your blood. And have you forgotten the exhortation that addresses you as sons?

“My son, do not regard lightly the discipline of the Lord,
nor be weary when reproved by him.
For the Lord disciplines the one he loves,
and chastises every son whom he receives.”

It is for discipline that you have to endure. God is treating you as sons. For what son is there whom his father does not discipline? If you are left without discipline, in which all have participated, then you are illegitimate children and not sons. Besides this, we have had earthly fathers who disciplined us and we respected them. Shall we not much more be subject to the Father of spirits and live? For they disciplined us for a short time as it seemed best to them, but he disciplines us for our good, that we may share his holiness. For the moment all discipline seems painful rather than pleasant, but later it yields the peaceful fruit of righteousness to those who have been trained by it.

Illness and early death are one way.

1 Corinthians 11:27-32

Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty concerning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment on himself. That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died. But if we judged ourselves truly, we would not be judged. But when we are judged by the Lord, we are disciplined so that we may not be condemned along with the world.


124 posted on 01/30/2011 12:26:38 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive
I posted:>> It isn’t the action that is rewarded but the belief that cause the action.<<

You responded>> But Scripture simply doesn't say this.<<

It most certainly does. I gave you a verse that showed it. James 2:23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.

What was imputed unto him for righteousness? His belief. “Abraham believed God, and it (the belief) was imputed unto him for righteousness. I don’t know how it could be made more clear.

125 posted on 01/30/2011 12:27:56 PM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: verga; RnMomof7; metmom; FatherofFive
This would be the same God that let Adam and Eve walk away from Him. weren't they "saved" yet they walked away and took the rest of us with them.

Apples and Oranges. You are confusing categories.

Prior to the fall Adam and Eve did not require salvation, they had not yet fallen. They were on probation and they sinned. At that point they needed salvation. They didn't follow one simple law. We can't follow any of them.

126 posted on 01/30/2011 12:32:16 PM PST by Gamecock (The resurrection of Jesus Christ is both historically credible and existentially satisfying. T.K.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Amen and Amen

Once again pointing out with scripture the folly of works salvation.


127 posted on 01/30/2011 12:32:22 PM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: verga
Really, you see in my Bible they left when they were saved, and Jesus came a long time AFTER they lost their salvation. Argue, rant, rave, whine to your hearts content, Adam and Eve lost their salvation.

Genesis 3:14–15 So the Lord God said to the serpent: “Because you have done this, You are cursed more than all cattle, And more than every beast of the field; On your belly you shall go, And nyou shall eat dust All the days of your life.
15 And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her Seed; (Christ insertion mine) He shall bruise your head, And you shall bruise His heel.”

This scripture is called the "proto-evangelium "

It is the first promise of a Savior in the Bible..

This is a demonstration of the Grace and mercy of God after the sinful rebellion of man ..that promise was to Adam and Eve and to all their offspring

128 posted on 01/30/2011 12:40:15 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Prior to the fall Adam and Eve did not require salvation, they had not yet fallen. They were on probation and they sinned. At that point they needed salvation. They didn't follow one simple law. We can't follow any of them.

Amen ...still working on basics here :)

129 posted on 01/30/2011 12:42:59 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: verga; RnMomof7
Argue, rant, rave, whine to your hearts content, Adam and Eve lost their salvation.

They weren't saved yet as they hadn't sinned, so there was no salvation to *lose*.

130 posted on 01/30/2011 12:50:24 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: metmom
They weren't saved yet as they hadn't sinned, so there was no salvation to *lose*.

Exactly ...

Some posts Just show some people have a large degree of biblical ignorance ..:(

131 posted on 01/30/2011 1:14:17 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: verga; RnMomof7; FatherofFive

**Really, you see in my Bible**

And just which “Bible” is that?

**they left when they were saved**

In the Christian Bible they had not yet fallen, so there was no one to save. They were on probation. Once they fell, we all fell in line right behind them.

**Jesus came a long time AFTER they lost their salvation.**

So? What’s your point? All of the O.T. Saints were “saved” by faith in Christ, just like we are. That is also in the Christian Bible.


132 posted on 01/30/2011 1:19:24 PM PST by Gamecock (The resurrection of Jesus Christ is both historically credible and existentially satisfying. T.K.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Benchim
<you were saved when you believed in Christ as the Son of God

That simple statement defines a Christian. Your Acceptance of Jesus is your individual salvation and no more need be said.

Others may believe that something is required of them to attain what Christians attain from faith and grace alone.

Taoism - Poop happens.

Hinduism - This poop happened before.

Buddhism - If poop happens, it isn't really poop.

Zen - What is the source of poop happening?

Islam - If poop happens, it is the will of Allah.

Jehovah's Witness - Knock, knock, " Poop happens."

Atheism - There is no poop.

Agnosticism - I don't know whether poop happens

Protestantism - Poop won't happen if I work harder.

Catholicism - If poop happens, I deserve it.

Judaism - Why does poop always happen to us?

133 posted on 01/30/2011 1:49:08 PM PST by MosesKnows (Love many, Trust few, and always paddle your own canoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Benchim

http://www.searchgodsword.org/lex/grk/view.cgi?number=1577

http://www.hisholychurch.net/ekklesia.php

http://www.baptistpillar.com/bd0004.htm

I searched and could not find a single site that offers the translation “all believers” for the Greek word ekklesia.

But, all the different and competing translations are moot.

The men and women who built up the early church were Jewish people used to meeting in a synagogue. It was only natural that as the assembly of believers grew they would gravitate towards a common place and then to eventually building a specific place for worship.

After the transfiguration, Peter immediately wants to erect three tents, one each for Jesus, Moses and Elijah. Places for them to dwell, a place such where God dwelt.

In Acts Chapter 6 we see the twelve appoint men to oversee the affairs of the church and once the men are chosen, the Apostles pray over them and lay hands upon them and the community is satisfied with this outcome.

Where some might see the supplanting of the word church in place of ekklesia as a sinister power grab, I see it as a completely predictable action in light of the fact that those who come to church are indeed those who believe. Why else would they come?

As far as my own church, I am a grateful, happy and peaceful Catholic who goes to church to worship God, pray and to receive Him in the Eucharist.


134 posted on 01/30/2011 2:00:49 PM PST by Jvette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: caww

So, if one produces no fruit and continues to lead a totally debauched and sinful life, does that mean he was not saved?

Even if he uttered the sinners’ prayer?


135 posted on 01/30/2011 2:08:17 PM PST by Jvette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Nevadan

.” In other words, God saved us not only to be with Him in heaven - but to get busy doing the works He has for us to do.

if that person never shows any evidence by their actions, deeds, works that they have truely allowed Jesus to be Lord of their lives - then that person’s faith is worthless.

Sounds like what the Catholic Church teaches.


136 posted on 01/30/2011 2:27:13 PM PST by Jvette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: metmom
works of the law do not equal works.

Robert Sungenis addresses this quite clearly in his "Not by Faith Alone" book. A very good read, but it is about 774 pages long.

Let me ask a simple question, yes or no - Do works play any role whatsoever in the Salvation plan of Christ for us?

137 posted on 01/30/2011 2:29:54 PM PST by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

Aren’t works a part of salvation?

If one is saved, doesn’t one then produce fruit?

How does one produce fruit without works?

.” In other words, God saved us not only to be with Him in heaven - but to get busy doing the works He has for us to do.

From an earlier post.


138 posted on 01/30/2011 2:34:40 PM PST by Jvette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: verga

re: So you are now saying that “works” are necessary

I am? Where did I do that?


139 posted on 01/30/2011 2:35:42 PM PST by Nevadan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: verga; CynicalBear; 1010RD; FatherofFive

I have always understood that passage merely to mean that since Jesus had returned to Heaven, it was up to the Apostles to continue spreading the word about Him.

It was not that Jesus’ affliction was not enough, obviously it was those afflictions which save us, but that it was up to them to spread that good news. That they suffered afflictions for that is absolutely true.


140 posted on 01/30/2011 2:51:56 PM PST by Jvette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-180 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson