It’s fairly obvious from all these quotes that whatever the ECF taught regarding the real presence it is far removed from the RC dogma of transubstantiation.
LOL! Thanks for the laugh. Either something is “REAL” or it is symbolic. can you be a little pregnant?
the 16th century tradition of men is a very strong delusion.
Regarding the above excerpts and the dogma of transubstantiation, "slam dunk", is the appropriate phrase here, I believe.
I'm glad you find them to be compatible with Protestant theology.
Progress.
You're probably the first so spread the word.