To: topcat54
It’s fairly obvious from all these quotes that whatever the ECF taught regarding the “real presence” it is far removed from the RC dogma of transubstantiation. Regarding the above excerpts and the dogma of transubstantiation, "slam dunk", is the appropriate phrase here, I believe.
I'm glad you find them to be compatible with Protestant theology.
Progress.
You're probably the first so spread the word.
31 posted on
01/27/2011 7:55:28 PM PST by
marshmallow
("A country which kills its own children has no future" -Mother Teresa of Calcutta)
To: marshmallow; Dr. Eckleburg; one Lord one faith one baptism; Gamecock; Alex Murphy
Regarding the above excerpts and the dogma of transubstantiation, "slam dunk", is the appropriate phrase here, I believe. The Romish doctrine of transubstantiation (local presence under each species, worship of the host, etc) is nowhere to be found in these comments.
51 posted on
01/28/2011 5:56:46 AM PST by
topcat54
("Dispensationalism -- an error of Biblical proportions.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson