[Zionist Conspirator]

you probably are right. I don’t know enough to comment.

If you think the entire thrust of our criticism of King is that he admired a non-chr*tian (Gandhi), then you didn't even read the article to begin with.

Martin Luther King was a liberal theologian who regarded the Bible as mythology whose only use was to provide utilitarian life-lessons about achieving "social justice."

Perhaps your theology is similar?

[Cronos]

1. I read the article

2. Where exactly did you read that I thought that "the entire thrust of our criticism of King is that he admired a non-chr*tian (Gandhi)"

3. Nope, that's not my theology -- is it yours?

4. Don't try to pick a fight over nothing -- I disputed a story about MLK's beliefs which seemed too way-out non-Christian for me to believe. You and soCon pointed out good points which showed that the article was not just one-sided. I acknowledged that you were right. Be happy that you've proved your point in a civilised manner, the moment you go into this "let's flame", you stop anyone listening to you -- remain civil and point out the facts and you'll find a lot better results