[Cronos]

I think we should read a balanced view rather than just one article. How valid is a writer who writes about someone after he is dead? Perhaps he’s correct, perhaps not, I think we needs to read more about this.

[Zionist Conspirator]

I think we should read a balanced view rather than just one article. How valid is a writer who writes about someone after he is dead? Perhaps he’s correct, perhaps not, I think we needs to read more about this.

Just a reminder that the article is from a friendly, pro-King source and is intended by the author as praise.

[SoConPubbie]

I think we should read a balanced view rather than just one article. How valid is a writer who writes about someone after he is dead? Perhaps he’s correct, perhaps not, I think we needs to read more about this.

Since he liberally sprinkles his article with direct quotes both from King and his college papers, I think it is correct, unless someone can provide quotes where he does a 180 on his stated beliefs concerning Christianity.

As it is, MLK was not a Christian.

He denied Christ and God in multiple ways, effectively setting himself up as wiser than the Apostles and the Christ as witnessed in the Bible.