They apparently had it as late as the 4th century. Did the Church lose the scriptures?
Interesting statement. Which Councils are you referring to?
Well, as much as I'm not impressed with the Council of Trent, we really don't have to go back too far to see that the Catholic Church viewed the scriptures as the authentic works.
DECREE CONCERNING THE EDITION, AND THE USE, OF THE SACRED BOOKS
Moreover, the same sacred and holy Synod,--considering that no small utility may accrue to the Church of God, if it be made known which out of all the Latin editions, now in circulation, of the sacred books, is to be held as authentic,--ordains and declares, that the said old and vulgate edition, which, by the lengthened usage of so many years, has been approved of in the Church, be, in public lectures, disputations, sermons and expositions, held as authentic; and that no one is to dare, or presume to reject it under any pretext whatever.
Impressive. I didn't realize that you used the Church-authorized Latin Bible. I thought that you used the KJV.
The proper term to use about the Bible is that is has no errors, that it is inerrant |
They apparently had it as late as the 4th century. Did the Church lose the scriptures?
Earlier than that. What you hold in your hands is not what the Council approved. For one thing, it is in English. Where is the authority that approved your Bible, Harley? And who?