There was no proselytizing just Good Will to counter act all of the anti LDS daily propaganda!
And just as the Catholics and other faiths were allowed a Caucus so was the LDS.
Big difference between a legitimate faith/denomination and a cult that has been proven beyond any doubt to be based on fraud and bad science...
Oh, give me a break!
PD referencing the "First Vision" of Joseph Smith in that article...
How is it "Good Will" to reference a source that labels ALL Christians as "corrupt" and ALL their creeds as an "abomination?" [see post #334]
How is it "Good Will" to talk about one man's literal distortion of the Bible (Smith's so-called "translation" of an English Bible into English -- when he couldn't read Greek or Hebrew)? [see post #334]
How is it "Good Will" for PD to post an article referencing a section of a book that points to a Book of Mormon violent Jesus (3 Nephi 8 & 9) and promotes occult contact with the dead [see post #454, #3 & 4]
The piece PD posted substitutes the focus on Christ with the focus on Joseph Smith. Mormons can't do enough to praise Smith on Dec. 23, when Christmas becomes Smithmas, so they have to sandwhich Christmas with even more "12 Days of Smithmas!"
There was no proselytizing just Good Will to counter act all of the anti LDS daily propaganda!
And just as the Catholics and other faiths were allowed a Caucus so was the LDS.
This is a very good point.
***There was no proselytizing just Good Will***
For Mormons it is one in the same!
“There was no proselytizing just Good Will to counter act all of the anti LDS daily propaganda!”
..........
Resty, all I can tell you is that I began posting in response
to the proselytizing and false claims of Mormonism. This was
at least 5 years ago - maybe more. I only posted in response
to the heresy that was posted.
ampu