Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Godzilla; SENTINEL
Sentinel is correct - mormon spin doctoring in action.

KJV w/ JST foot notes DU?


Like you would know the only reason your personality is stable is that the gyroscopic effect keeps it from wobbling. (A little spin humor there...)

Godzilla, your attempt to make this slanderous is just downright silly, I actually frequent several bibles, one in Chinese with no footnotes at all, one is the standards works of the LDS Church, which does have the JST in as foot notes, as well as several others, I even use on line comparisons of several different versions of the bible as well as look at the history and origin of words.

I honestly spend more time on FR talking about the JST than any other time or place, so you (those asking about it) are spending as much time on the JST as I am.

Is it your contention that I should spend less time with the KJV and more with the JST? If not, why do you keep bringing it up?

Delph
1,436 posted on 01/04/2011 10:52:50 AM PST by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 847 | View Replies ]


To: DelphiUser; SENTINEL
Godzilla, your attempt to make this slanderous is just downright silly, I actually frequent several bibles, one in Chinese with no footnotes at all, one is the standards works of the LDS Church, which does have the JST in as foot notes, as well as several others, I even use on line comparisons of several different versions of the bible as well as look at the history and origin of words.

Slanderous? Oh that is choice victimology. Remarkable because I've seen of evidence of any application of those studies in your posts.

Is it your contention that I should spend less time with the KJV and more with the JST? If not, why do you keep bringing it up?

The JST is your prophets corrected kjv is it not - therefore more reliable and correctly translated? Yet you don't cite it here at all. LOL, guess you must consider it spurious just like 'ol bring'em young eh?

1,438 posted on 01/04/2011 10:59:31 AM PST by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1436 | View Replies ]

To: DelphiUser
Is it your contention that I should spend less time with the KJV and more with the JST?

NO no no no no no no no no no....

1. The CONTENTION is the LDS Articles of Faith casts DOUBT on the translation purity of the KJV bible.

2. JS backs UP this doubt by TRANSLATING (wink-wink nudge-nudge) the KJV into the JST AS ORDERED by GOD!

3. The LDS religious organization, based in Salt Lake City, USES the KJV; doubts and all.

4. The LDS religious organization, based in Salt Lake City, does NOT consider the JST to be SCRIPTURE, even though (see #2)


Clearer now?

1,512 posted on 01/04/2011 1:15:50 PM PST by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1436 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson