Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: James C. Bennett

The underlying problem is that an artificial separation was established between empiricism and “pure reason” (science and philosophy).

Aristotle knew the importance of both for the purpose of finding truth in an academic sense.

But philosophers of the past half millenia or more have fooled themselves into believing pure reason can enlighten. So we have people like Hegel proposing that altruism can’t exist in the absence of civilization, and Kant trying to convince himself that reality is the creation of subjective mind.

They are fools, I daresay.


148 posted on 12/23/2010 1:32:40 PM PST by reasonisfaith (Rules will never work for radicals (liberals) because they seek chaos. And don't even know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: reasonisfaith
and Kant trying to convince himself that reality is the creation of subjective mind.

Humor columnist Dave Barry of the Miami Herald put it better.

He said that

philosophy consists of proving that there is no such thing as reality, and then going to have lunch.

Cheers!

171 posted on 12/26/2010 9:23:11 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson