Posted on 12/12/2010 9:45:28 PM PST by Pmary65
Daniels 69 Prophetic Weeks Chapter 9 (KJV)
23. At the beginning of thy supplications the commandment came forth, and I am come to shew thee; for thou art greatly beloved: therefore understand the matter, and consider the vision.
24. Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.
25. Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.
26. And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
* Daniels vision has been interpreted with various methods of calculation from the time in the second rebuilding of the temple by Nehemiah in 445 B.C. to a later tangible crucifixion year in the cutting off of the Messiah. Hence, an interpretation by Jewish reckoning counts 7+62 = 69 Sabbatical week year periods every 7 years as shown in the chart below being derived from Benedict Zuckermanns works;
A Treatise on the Sabbatical Cycle and the Jubilee: A Contribution to the Archaeology and Chronology of the Time Anterior and Subsequent to the Captivity (trans. A. Lowy; London: Chronological Institute, 1866; repr. New York: Sepher Hermon Press, 1974).
445/444 B.C. Temple Rebuilding
444/443 B.C. 1st Sabbatical Year
437/436 B.C. 2nd Sabbatical Year
430/429 B.C. 3rd Sabbatical Year
423/422 B.C. 4th Sabbatical Year
416/415 B.C. 5th Sabbatical Year
409/408 B.C. 6th Sabbatical Year
402/401 B.C. 7th Sabbatical Year
395/394 B.C. 8th Sabbatical Year
388/387 B.C. 9th Sabbatical Year
381/380 BC 10th Sabbatical Year
374/373 BC 11th Sabbatical Year
367/366 BC 12th Sabbatical Year
360/359 BC 13th Sabbatical Year
353/352 BC 14th Sabbatical Year
346/345 BC 15th Sabbatical Year
339/338 BC 16th Sabbatical Year
332/331 BC 17th Sabbatical Year
325/324 BC 18th Sabbatical Year
318/317 BC 19th Sabbatical Year
311/310 BC 20th Sabbatical Year
304/303 BC 21st Sabbatical Year
297/296 BC 22nd Sabbatical Year
290/289 BC 23rd Sabbatical Year
283/282 BC 24th Sabbatical Year
276/275 BC 25th Sabbatical Year
269/268 BC 26th Sabbatical Year
262/261 BC 27th Sabbatical Year
255/254 BC 28th Sabbatical Year
248/247 BC 29th Sabbatical Year
241/240 BC 30th Sabbatical Year
234/233 BC 31st Sabbatical Year
227/226 BC 32nd Sabbatical Year
220/219 BC 33rd Sabbatical Year
213/212 BC 34th Sabbatical Year
206/205 BC 35th Sabbatical Year
199/198 BC 36th Sabbatical Year
192/191 BC 37th Sabbatical Year
185/184 BC 38th Sabbatical Year
178/177 BC 39th Sabbatical Year
171/170 BC 40th Sabbatical Year
164/163 BC 41st Sabbatical Year
157/156 BC 42nd Sabbatical Year
150/149 BC 43rd Sabbatical Year
143/142 BC 44th Sabbatical Year
136/135 BC 45th Sabbatical Year
129/128 BC 46th Sabbatical Year
122/121 BC 47th Sabbatical Year
115/114 BC 48th Sabbatical Year
108/107 BC 49th Sabbatical Year
101/100 BC 50th Sabbatical Year
94/93 BC. 51st Sabbatical Year
87/86 BC. 52nd Sabbatical Year
80/79 BC. 53rd Sabbatical Year
73/72 BC. 54th Sabbatical Year
66/65 BC. 55th Sabbatical Year
59/58 BC. 56th Sabbatical Year
52/51 BC. 57th Sabbatical Year
45/44 BC. 58th Sabbatical Year
38/37 BC. 59th Sabbatical Year
31/30 BC. 60th Sabbatical Year
24/23 BC. 61st Sabbatical Year
17/16 BC. 62nd Sabbatical Year
10/9 B.C.. 63rd Sabbatical Year
3/2 B.C . 64th Sabbatical Year
+ 5/6 A.D . 65th Sabbatical Year
+ 12/13 AD. 66th Sabbatical Year
+ 19/20 AD. 67th Sabbatical Year
+ 26/27 AD. 68th Sabbatical Year
+ 33/34 AD. 69th Sabbatical Year Messiah is cut off
* Sabbatical years were referred to as release periods where debts were forgiven, and the fields lay fallow to replenish the earth. Here the Jewish Sabbatical years are displayed from the autumn/Tishri to Tishri/autumn season overlapping the adjoining Civil calendar years. Thus, the passion event of the Messiah Jesus occurred on the 69th sabbatical year after the order for the second rebuilding of the temple by Nehemiah in 445 B.C. at the time of king Artaxerxes 1 Longimanus. Thus, the resurrection day, the day of Pentecost, and the year of passion were all revealed significantly being emphasized through God as the redeemed Lord of the Sabbath.
For further applicable references read; SABBATICAL YEARS, JUBILEES, AND PRIESTLY COURSES (Sec. 224) in the Handbook of Biblical Chronology by Jack Finegan (Revised Edition C. 1998 Hendrickson Publishers, Inc. ISBN 1-56563-143-9.
http://books.google.ca/books?ei=8ZUFTbaoEoujnweA7LnlDQ&ct=result&id=bHYUAQAAIAAJ&dq=Handbook+of+Biblical+Chronology&q=release
Best Regards Pmary65
For a complete comprehensive review backing this subject feel free to visit;
http://www.pmary65.wordpress.com
Is it still a fantasy then?
All headlines match up with Biblical prophecy. And always have. Which is why there are always suckers lining up to buy the newest end time books.
LOL!!
"Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, And saying, Where is the promise of His coming? For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all continues just as it was from the beginning of creation. (II Peter 3:3-4)
No, I'm afraid that the headlines have not always matched up with Bible prophecy.
Scoffing at dispensational (or preterist for that matter) delusions is not denying Christ will return. Everybody got the details (and interpretation of the prophecies) wrong the first time around and it will be the same the second time. Now go buy your new Hal lindsay book - it’ll be in the fiction section.
Maybe not. Like for example only a total wack job would try to fit the latest food regulation headlines into bible prophecy. Right? Bwhahahahaha.
This should be interesting.
Since you are not a dispensationalist, how about premillennialist? Are you Premill? Postmill? Amill?
Also, you said you are not a preterist, does that mean you are Historicist? Futurist?
But a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised. (2 Corinthians 2:14
Many will be purged, purified and refined, but the wicked will act wickedly; and none of the wicked will understand, but those who have insight will understand. (Daniel 12:10
Understanding Scripture and having the discernment to see the signs that Jesus Christ commanded His people to look for as evidence of His soon return requires that a person know Jesus as his Savior and have a personal relationship with Him.
When a person is blind to not only the Scripture that gives us the signs to look for but also to the fact that these prophecies are being fulfilled on a daily basis, that person has no spiritual discernment because he does not know the God Who gives spiritual discernment.
That person has a lot more to worry about that whether or not someone is a dispensationalist. Much, much bigger problems. Eternal destiny problems.
Hey PB, I agree with you. Their starting date is off, and there are two different annointed ones or messiahs, One is Cyrus and the other is a corrupt messiah who is cut-off. Righteous people are never cut-off.
INDEED.
You are in above your pay grade.....WHY?.......Because you dangle the prospect that you know something but stop short of explaining what you believe to be true.
In fact, why did you even stop on this thread to make a comment? You are not a believer so go your way and let individuals who believe, be free to discuss their faith. Why do you feel obligated to criticize?
http://www.hebcal.com/hebcal/
You are welcome:
The explanation of Daniel 9:24-29 with the 360 day years and without the Masoretic break between verses 25 and 26 is best done at:
Enjoy!
- ROTB
I’m sorry sir, but I cannot find your contribution to this thread either.
Thank you. I used the same method as described in this article (just taking a date and backing into it) and guess what? I'm the moshiach!
B'H
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
Daniel 9:25, 26
Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times. And after threescore and two weeks shall the Messiah be cut off
* Many biblical SCHOLARS interpret the Messiah the Prince from these verses as the One and only true Messiah being Jesus the son of the living Father. Thus being said, the cut off point would pertain to a crucifixion year where the set scriptural conditions must have applied. For example;
John 11:9
Jesus answered, Are there not twelve hours [light] in the day? If any man walk in the day, he stumbleth not, because he seeth the light of this world.
Matthew 12:39, 40
But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas: For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be 'three days and three nights' in the heart of the earth.
Mark 8:31
And he began to teach them, that the Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders, and of the chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and 'after three days' rise again.
Matthew 27:63
Saying, Sir, we remember that that deceiver said, while he was yet alive, 'After three days' I will rise again.
Acts 1:5 (on the day of ascension)
For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost (the day of Pentecost) 'not many days' hence.
Best Regards Pmary65
I searched out your ‘User’ name to see that you use the word ‘dispensationalism’ quite frequently in your responses to other threads. That’s okay - I won’t take it personally!
Best Regards - Pmary65
I find them stubbornly bent on getting the gospel wrong.
Unmitigated nonsense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.