You're confused. Your question to which I was responding had nothing to do with Pelagianism.
You wrote:
“You’re confused.”
Not in the least.
“Your question to which I was responding had nothing to do with Pelagianism.”
Your earlier comment did. You said: “Clearly it is. Augustine would not teach a Pelagian doctrine like the IC.”
Thus, according to you, the Immaculate Conception as a doctrine is Pelagian. You then relied upon a Jansenist for your information to attempt to refute the Immaculate Conception. Thus, you relied upon a Jansenist for what you believe to be proof of Pelagianism. I clearly am not confused in the least. You apparently are.