To: wagglebee
And keep in mind that the Immaculate Conception and Assumption of the Blessed Mother are things that JESUS DID, not Mary.There's a reason John didn't tell us the other signs that Jesus performed...And that's because they were nothing that we needed to know for our salvation...
If there was an Immaculate Conception and Assumption of Mary, Jesus would have told us...And since He didn't, your religion is just making it up...
958 posted on
12/07/2010 8:20:49 AM PST by
Iscool
(I don't understand all that I know...)
To: Iscool; Jaded; Judith Anne; Legatus; maryz; NYer; Salvation; Pyro7480; Coleus; narses; annalex; ...
There's a reason John didn't tell us the other signs that Jesus performed...And that's because they were nothing that we needed to know for our salvation... There's NOTHING in the Gospel of Saint John at all about the Virgin Birth.
If there was an Immaculate Conception and Assumption of Mary, Jesus would have told us...And since He didn't, your religion is just making it up...
The fact that the Nestorian interpretation of Scripture denies this, does not mean that the Church made it up.
962 posted on
12/07/2010 8:27:45 AM PST by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: Iscool; wagglebee
There's a reason John didn't tell us the other signs that Jesus performed...And that's because they were nothing that we needed to know for our salvation...
Ah, so you now can read minds of St. John and others? Also, so you say it's ok for something not to be in the bible because they were not needed for our salvation? the IC and Assumption are not necessary for our salvation -- Church teaching is that salvation came from Jesus Christ's sacrifice.
1,340 posted on
12/08/2010 1:30:52 AM PST by
Cronos
(Et Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis (And the word was made flesh, and dwelt amonst us))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson