Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: mrreaganaut

“I assume that the author belongs to one of the ‘fundamentalist’ Mormon sects.”

Sheesh! Doesn’t anybody click on the original post anymore?

I’m the writer of the piece under discussion, and aligned with mainstream LDS. You’ll find, however, that I am not in thrall to the Brethren nor their constant bleating for obeisance.

Webheart, I emphasize with your frustration regarding all the italicizing, bolding, and increasing of the font size of my article. Although I understand Greyfox’s motivation for emphasizing certain points (and I appreciate him for reposting it!), those emphases are his, not mine. So Elsie, no need to put my words back into a word processor and straighten them all out again. You’ll find my post in it’s original form quite readable here, complete with a snappy portrait of Jesus as the Corporate Man:

http://puremormonism.blogspot.com/2010/10/how-corporatism-has-undermined-and.html

Also, note that Greyfox did not post the entire article; in fact, my piece wasn’t called “The Vanishing LDS Church.” That was just a subtitle of one section. The full piece is titled “How Corporatism Has Undermined and Subverted The Church of Jesus Christ.”

In there I have already addressed Mr. Reaganaut’s concerns about how a church can function absent corporation.

The very question is evidence of how thoroughly Americans have come to accept the premise that no business can function without being incorporated. Prior to the 20th century romance for such status, people did just fine as regular businesses, sole proprietors, partnerships, or simply companies.

Many churches today have come to the realization that they have been conned into thinking incorporation was necessary, and there is a rush now to dis-incorporate. You might want to ask those churches how they manage to pay their employees and engage in commerce with suppliers. They are able to do so because they operate as a church, an independent entity that does not seek permission from the State for its existence. They seem to be functioning just fine, as churches always did before America went corporate crazy a hundred years ago.

I would remind Mr. Reaganaut by the way, that churches don’t pay property taxes. At least those not subject to Caesar.

You can’t claim Christ as the head of your church if you have to first petition the State for permission to exist.


44 posted on 01/15/2011 10:57:32 AM PST by Rockwaterman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Rockwaterman; Elsie; webheart; greyfoxx39

Courtesy ping to FReepers mentioned in your reply, that weren’t pinged.

Btw, thanks for bumping the thread...


45 posted on 01/15/2011 11:06:00 AM PST by SZonian (July 27, 2010. Life begins anew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Rockwaterman

I’m sorry, I clicked on the link to the book at Amazon. I apologize for assuming by the harshness of your (apparently excerpted) article that you were not mainstream LDS. I do agree that incorporation is immaterial to the purposes of the Church.


46 posted on 01/15/2011 3:27:00 PM PST by mrreaganaut (See the Gadianton Robbers' Hideout at Zion National Park!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Rockwaterman; SZonian; mrreaganaut
Welcome to FR, Mr. Waterman.

As you stated in your article, "I wanted to include the following information in the essay above, but the piece was already so long I didn't have the heart to put you readers through a longer stretch."......the excerpt I DID post is quite long, thus the emphasis on certain points. As I explained, a lot of readers are inclined to see a long post and rather than wade through it, will move on. I feel that the information you have made available is of interest to the readers of the mormon threads.

As to the "meat" of the article, I pull this quote from you...You can’t claim Christ as the head of your church if you have to first petition the State for permission to exist.

I'm sure I am speaking for many when I change it just a little.."You can’t claim Christ as the head of your church if you have to first petition the State for permission to exist answer to a leadership consisting of businessmen and attorneys and a "prophet" who requires a "sustaining vote".

Council on the Disposition of the Tithes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Council on the Disposition of the Tithes (also known as the Council on the Disposition of Tithing) is a leadership body in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, composed of the First Presidency, the Presiding Bishopric, and Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. The Council determines how the tithing funds of the church will be spent. The Council oversees revenue, investments and expenditures valued at billions of dollars per year.

While the Church employs an independent auditing department which provides an annual report to the Church[1], it has not published full financial reports since 1959.

The Council was established by church founder Joseph Smith, Jr. on 8 July 1838.[2] As of April 2009, the members of the Council are:

I invite you to stick around and join in the discussion here. We welcome new voices to the debate.

47 posted on 01/15/2011 5:20:36 PM PST by greyfoxx39 ("Journalists" see no problem with fueling a mass panic over our "political discourse.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson