Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee; aruanan; bibletruth; evangmlw; SENTINEL
So, let me raise the font so that the toot seekers get it
the KJV is based almost entirely on the Textus Receptus and even a little bit from the Vulgate.

the Textus Receptus was translated by Erasmus ... (he) used the Vulgate wherever necessary to "fill in the blanks."

Erasmus was a CATHOLIC PRIEST who strongly rejected the Reformation

the Latin Vulgate was/is the CATHOLIC translation by St. Jerome
So, The KJV is derived from two translations:
1. the Latin Vulgate of the Catholic Church and
2. a translation by a Catholic priest


So, I guess they got to now toss out the KJV just like they are tossing out the NIV? So what will happen to solo scriptura folks?
296 posted on 11/30/2010 6:48:31 AM PST by Cronos (Et Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis (And the word was made flesh, and dwelt amonst us))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos
Protestants and a lot of Catholics may not like to admit it, but the KJV and D-R are nearly identical throughout.

Up until about fifty years ago Latin was pretty much a required course in high schools and college and much of the learning involved translating from Latin to English (or whatever the student's native language was). If if a very good student were to translate the Vulgate into English without any other aid than a Latin-English dictionary, the result would be pretty much identical to the KJV or D-R.

302 posted on 11/30/2010 7:10:54 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson