Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: 1000 silverlings
Yeah, but his wife was still ticked off that in his enthusiasm, he exposed himself like a common perv. And scripture doesn't mention any of the prophets, or God directly, taking David to task over it.

Ergo things which may at first glance appear to be "wild" *might* still happen to be inspired by God.

Discernment (rather than broad brush) might be a better tool.

Cheers!

146 posted on 11/24/2010 3:05:50 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers; Dr. Eckleburg; the_conscience
you are incorrect: David was wearing a linen tunic, plain dress, for *he humbled himself before the Lord.* Michel complained that he was dressed like a peasant, not that he was undressed. As the daughter of Saul, she had royal pretensions, and did not understand.

David rebuked her, righteously, and God punished her for her remarks.

148 posted on 11/24/2010 3:22:44 PM PST by 1000 silverlings (everything that deceives, also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson