[metmom]

I recall the discussion well. As with many actual Christians it isn't what St. Paul actually wrote that is "loony", it is the bizarre Protestant interpretations and importance that has been assigned to them that invokes the ridicule.

Apparently your recall is completely flawed.

That is NOT what the conversation was about.

[Judith Anne]

As far as I am concerned, I am finished with this discussion. If you disagree, then let’s ask the Religion Moderator if everyone on THIS thread gets to bring up the topic at least once, or not.

Because I consider the continuing remarks to be, as the Religion Moderator said, “flame baiting.”

RM, please excuse the courtesy ping. I have continually tried to end this.

[presently no screen name]

You’re right, metmom.

NL - clearly you are wrong - it’s was the posters feelings towards St Paul. Why did you twist it back to the doings of Protestant’s? Is that what the RCC teaches you to do? Is that considered being well taught in the Catechism?

[Natural Law]

"Apparently your recall is completely flawed."

My recall is near perfect. In a public thread Judith Anne stated that that she thought St. Paul loony. My offline discussions ascertained the reasons why. This reason concurred with mine. It is your mind reading that is flawed.