To: Dr. Eckleburg
It's pretty funny when the RC apologist reads Philip Schaff and sees support for Rome. Yet Protestant critic admits the historicity of Peter's line of succession in Rome. That was my only point.
To: mas cerveza por favor; Dr. Eckleburg
It's pretty funny when the RC apologist reads Philip Schaff and sees support for Rome.
Yet Protestant critic admits the historicity of Peter's line of succession in Rome. That was my only point. Acknowledgment of a claim of historicity is not acknowledgment of fact.
2,399 posted on
11/17/2010 11:23:58 AM PST by
OLD REGGIE
(I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson