To: mas cerveza por favor; Dr. Eckleburg
It's pretty funny when the RC apologist reads Philip Schaff and sees support for Rome.
Yet Protestant critic admits the historicity of Peter's line of succession in Rome. That was my only point. Acknowledgment of a claim of historicity is not acknowledgment of fact.
2,399 posted on
11/17/2010 11:23:58 AM PST by
OLD REGGIE
(I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
To: OLD REGGIE
Acknowledgment of a claim of historicity is not acknowledgment of fact. Protestant historian Philip Schaff acknowledged numerous testaments of Petrine succession from widely varying sources.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson