Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: mas cerveza por favor
Who is the "the one adding their traditions to HIS WORD"? Are you condemning the Apostles?

Playing games with words proves nothing and does nothing to glorify God ..The apostles were dead within 100 years of Christ's crucification. They like all men were subject to sin and error, with the exception of the inspired scriptures, their teachings they were not infallible..

Most of what we see as extra biblical Catholic tradition came well after that, as late as the 1950s by deluded men that believe their own publicity , seeing themselves as prophets and infallible

The Sixteenth Century avant garde Protestants were not simple men. They were modern-minded sophisticates who looked down upon the "old wives tales" and "medieval superstitions" inherited from 1500 years of Christian history.

Not one of them had men falling at their feet or kissing their rings.. they stood on the word of God as written by those simple men

Hbr 4:12 For the word of God [is] quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and [is] a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

2,055 posted on 11/15/2010 12:38:47 PM PST by RnMomof7 (Gal 4:16 asks "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2044 | View Replies ]


To: RnMomof7
Nice try, but the burden BEFORE GOD and men is on the one adding their traditions to HIS WORD..
Who is the "the one adding their traditions to HIS WORD"? Are you condemning the Apostles?
Playing games with words proves nothing and does nothing to glorify God ..The apostles were dead within 100 years of Christ's crucification. They like all men were subject to sin and error, with the exception of the inspired scriptures, their teachings they were not infallible..

The question stands. Do you condemn the Apostles for adding their traditions to HIS WORD? It is a simple query derived from your own statement. You hedged on the answer. Try again or perhaps you should just withdraw your original statement.

The Sixteenth Century avant garde Protestants were not simple men.
Not one of them had men falling at their feet or kissing their rings.. they stood on the word of God as written by those simple men

LOL. The Protestant princes were "liberated" from obedience to the Church but the people had to bow and scrape before the new absolutist power of government. Previously, there had been a balance of power between the "lords temporal and religious." Subsequently, the people were on their own with no authoritative religious leaders to protect them. The Church had kept one third of the land in Europe as living space for peasants and monks. The newly "liberated" princes seized these properties for themselves and booted off the inhabitants. Luther bitterly lamented this result in his later years.

2,064 posted on 11/15/2010 1:09:34 PM PST by mas cerveza por favor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2055 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson