“...when receiving a revelation it is related to understand of the recipient”
Uhm, I’m not sure I understand...
I suspect Resty is trying to say that unless one is lacking in understanding, one is not capable of receiving or comprehending “revelation” that is essentially provided to their level of comprehension. (dumbed down?)
Since I don’t believe I need an intermediary here on earth (prophets), the statement is of little value or consequence to me.
***
I suspect Resty is trying to say that unless one is lacking in understanding, one is not capable of receiving or comprehending “revelation” that is essentially provided to their level of comprehension. (dumbed down?)
__
Is it not better to ask than to assume or assign intent...
Uhm, let be more clear ok.
That’s why I pinged you to my response.
If it was my intent to not solicit “clarification”, only to post a smarmy comment by omitting the FReeper name when I posted my comment, I would have done so.
Ha!
From MORMONs??
They just either:
1. Refuse to answer the Question
2. Answer a question they think SHOULD have been asked
3. Play dumb and say they din't understand the question.