Uhm, I'm not sure I understand...
I suspect Resty is trying to say that unless one is lacking in understanding, one is not capable of receiving or comprehending "revelation" that is essentially provided to their level of comprehension. (dumbed down?)
Since I don't believe I need an intermediary here on earth (prophets), the statement is of little value or consequence to me.
“...when receiving a revelation it is related to understand of the recipient”
Uhm, I’m not sure I understand...
I suspect Resty is trying to say that unless one is lacking in understanding, one is not capable of receiving or comprehending “revelation” that is essentially provided to their level of comprehension. (dumbed down?)
Since I don’t believe I need an intermediary here on earth (prophets), the statement is of little value or consequence to me.
***
I suspect Resty is trying to say that unless one is lacking in understanding, one is not capable of receiving or comprehending “revelation” that is essentially provided to their level of comprehension. (dumbed down?)
__
Is it not better to ask than to assume or assign intent...
Amen to that. Priests too.
Dumbed down. I get it.
I suspect Resty is trying to say that unless one is lacking in understanding, one is not capable of receiving or comprehending “revelation” that is essentially provided to their level of comprehension. (dumbed down?)
***
My reply was
Is it not better to ask than to assume or assign intent...
What you said was assuming those were my intention which was far from what I said!
you wanted to quibble over whit vs jot being used there could be many reason why that word was used.
Neither you nor I was there when it was being printed who knows maybe the printed used a more current terms or some one else was the editor.
I apologized for leaving you name off but I had at the time been deleleting names previous before your post when I was posting you tube links.
Sorry for the boobo hopes it makes it all better!