To: PAR35
That's an excellent point.
While the rift in the PCUSA is recent, within the last year, it's still a definite change about belief among groups.
As the polygamy issue goes back over a hundred years ago, I hope the usual FR suspects who post all the "fLDS" stuff are taking note.
61 posted on
10/22/2010 10:26:37 AM PDT by
Ripliancum
("If a wise man contendeth with a foolish man, whether he rage or laugh, there is no rest." Prov.29:9)
To: Ripliancum
As the polygamy issue goes back over a hundred years ago, I hope the usual FR suspects who post all the "fLDS" stuff are taking note. Yes, and D&C 132 - the 'revelation' that sanctioned polygamy is still valid doctrine for lds, flds and other D&C accepting 'x-lds' groups.
65 posted on
10/22/2010 10:34:54 AM PDT by
Godzilla
(3-7-77)
To: Ripliancum
... I hope the usual FR suspects who post all the "fLDS" stuff are taking note. Oh?
Is it time to point out SLC's HYPOCRACY now?
79 posted on
10/22/2010 10:55:57 AM PDT by
Elsie
( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Ripliancum; PAR35
At least the Texas group are the real followers of Joseph Smith’s church (the real Mormons). They haven’t thrown D&C132 under the bus.
It may have been 100 years, that doesn’t mean it still isn’t in your scriptures.
96 posted on
10/22/2010 11:53:35 AM PDT by
reaganaut
(Ex Mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson