Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Dudoight

They could have put it out and sent him a bill. It would hav been a lot more than $75.


8 posted on 10/07/2010 7:16:44 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin
They could have put it out and sent him a bill. It would hav been a lot more than $75.

Then why would ANYONE pay $75/yr to the FD? The FD is not supported by tax dollars, so the money has to come from somewhere. If no one pays the 'insurance', then the FD will go broke - and then NO ONE will have fire protection. Do you want a Nanny State - which is essentially communism - or do you subscribe to the basic principle of Personal Responsibility? It's really that simple.

13 posted on 10/07/2010 7:22:46 AM PDT by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
They could have put it out and sent him a bill.

No the couldn't.

If they put it out, they would be doing so at their own cost. The Fire Department/City cannot 'charge' him for services he has refused to subscribe to.

They would be better off to sick the EPA on him for violating local air standards because the Fire Department was left with no recourse but to watch it burn.

50 posted on 10/07/2010 8:00:05 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson