I understand what you’re saying. I also understand the limitations of what you’re saying. Essentially it boils down to this:
People are allowed to lie here.
People, however, are not allowed to note that someone has lied here.
People are allowed to make inflammatory lying statements.
People, however, are not allowed to note that inflammatory lying statements have been made here.
People can call statements “false” or “erroneous” but not “lies” or perhaps even “dishonest”. This applies to statements such as this (please note the section in caps):
“The RCC says the priest is greater than the rest of us, more holy, closer to God, and THEREFORE ENTITLED TO WHATEVER PLEASURABLE LARKS HE MIGHT FEEL THE NEED TO EXPERIENCE.”
I understand the rules. I also understand how Protestant anti-Catholics routinely lie and hide behind the rules here. It’s what they do and it’s what the rules here, sadly, foster. But I do understand.
You betcha.
How else to explain so many priests raping young boys>
Read the following Roman Catholic link written by Father Kenneth Baker who tells us...
"...Simply stated, the Catholic priest is another Christ. Through his ordination he has been granted the amazing gift of being a channel of divine grace for the eternal salvation of those he come into contact with — both in his official ministry and in his personal life.
It's unScriptural and blasphemous enough to believe a priest is "another Christ" in "his official ministry," but why would any man need to be (nor should be even want to be) "another Christ in his personal life???"
It doesn't take any advanced degrees to realize the capacity for abuse a title like "another Christ in your private life" provides.
And sadly, RC priests have lived up to the false nomenclature.