Posted on 09/08/2010 5:57:07 AM PDT by Buggman
Yom Teruah, better known as Rosh Hashannah, is upon us. I'd thought about creating a nice, elaborate blog post, but decided instead to take the opportunity to plug my book, When the Stars Fall, Vol. 1, by linking to the .pdf of the sample of Interlude 5: The Feast of Trumpets. Here are a few highlights to whet your appitite:
However, [Rosh Hashannah is] not its Biblical name, which is Yom Teruah, the Day of the [Trumpet] Blast:Shalom, and L'shannah Tova.The LORD spoke to Moses, saying, Speak to the children of Israel, saying, In the seventh month, on the first day of the month, shall be a solemn rest to you, a memorial of blowing [of shofars], a holy convocation. You shall do no regular work; and you shall offer an offering made by fire to the LORD.51In each of these passages, shofars is in brackets because its not actually in the Hebrew text; however, teruah can and usually does mean to sound the trumpet (though it can mean to shout with a voice as well) and the use of a shofar on this day is considered so axiomatic that there is literally no debate in Jewish tradition on the matter. The shofar may be made from the horn of any kosher animal save that of the bull, in memory of the sin of the golden calf.In the seventh month, on the first day of the month, you shall have a holy convocation; you shall do no servile work: it is a day of blowing [of shofars] to you.52
(Excerpt) Read more at michaelbugg.com ...
Shalom
So correct.
Shana tovah & todah.
ML/NJ
The only troublesome part is that our congregation is so tragically inept with the shofar. Enduring the staccato blasts, sputters, squeaks, and hisses is effectively comedic torture. But the book sez "do it," so do it we do.
It is an awakening all righty, one proper in preparation for atonement all on its own.
Thanks, and to you!
The first day of the seventh month is the "new year of years." It is the anniversary of the Sixth Day of Creation and of Adam and Eve's creation. Years are numbered from the seventh month, as is evident in the instructions concerning the shemitah and yovel years, which are dated from the seventh month, not the first month.
The first month (Nisan) is the new year of the seasons, the new moons, the Biblical feasts, and the reign of Jewish kings. The intercalation is made prior to the first month, which fixes the months and seasons for the year to come. But years (such as the shemitah and yovel mentioned above) are still dated from the seventh month, which is when the year itself changes.
That is a tradition. It is not in the Tanakh.
It is the anniversary of the Sixth Day of Creation and of Adam and Eve's creation.
That is a tradition. It is not in the Tanakh.
Years are numbered from the seventh month, as is evident in the instructions concerning the shemitah and yovel years, which are dated from the seventh month, not the first month.
You are correct that the Talmud Yerushalayim Tractate Sheviis records the Mishnaic ruling that the Shemitta year (and therefore Yoveil) begin on Rosh Hashannah. However, that ruling falls afoul of Devarim 31:10-11 which goes completely unmentioned through several chapters of discussion on the topic:
Although there are exculpatory reasons for it, the ruling to which you refer (on page 1b if I recall correctly) is clearly in conflict with Torah. As I said, there had to be an exculpatory reason. Care to know why they did it?
A limited release of my book on Shemitta is available here. It is undergoing a major revision that will be placed online for free. Here is a review.
THANKS THANKS.
Much appreciated.
For some reason the MS substitute for pdf has not been fun for me. LOL.
Evidently a number of folks have been healed and delivered at the blasts of the Shofar . . . so . . . I don’t get too bothered by the sound or the inept who’ve never quite gotten the hang of a trumpet mouthpiece.
A Shofar is no trumpet. The reason it is so difficult to blow is that usually the mouthpiece is very small. I'd really like one made from a big-horn.
YHvH's blessings on you and yours for sharing the chapter of the your book.shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiachAn additional blessing on all who read it on this Holy eve.
L'shannah Tova.
Ergo, we shouldn't judge someone for traditions that don't annul the Torah.
It's quite probabole that Rosh Hashannah was the original "New Year"--most Ancient Near Eastern cultures had their new year at about that time. Thus, when the Holy One established Nisan, the month of Passover, as the beginning of the religious calendar ("This shall be the beginning of months for you"), He was changing it from what had been established up to that point.
You cannot have the end of the agricultural year right after beginning it.
Exactly! Neither can you have it in the middle of the year! The argument from the Sh'mitta year actually supports the idea of a Tishri New Year, since it says "at the end," not, "in the middle." Based on that, the rabbis understood "at the end of the year" to refer to Yom Teruah, but that the Sh'mitta would be formally announced at Sukkot, since the latter was a pilgrimage Feast and all Israel would be gathered together, while at Rosh Hashannah most people would still be in their own villages. Furthermore, since a person was supposed to receive gifts from their master when they were released, this would mean that not only could they come to Sukkot as free men, they could come with their own sacrifices and provisions for the Feast.
In other words, they interpreted the passage very precisely and in such a way as to show maximum mercy to the poor. Yeshua would approve, I think.
The rabbinic belief that the world began on Rosh Hashannah does come from Scripture, albeit at the midrash or even sod level of interpretation: In Hebrew, "In the beginning" anagrams to "First in Tishri." Even many Christian scholars, such as Bishop Unger, have accepted (at least tentatively) the rabbis' view on this matter, so there's no real point in arguing it.
Shalom
True.
However, one can usually insert a normal trumpet mouthpiece in the small end of the shofar.
Now, what earthshaking event happened exactly 9 years ago? It outlines 14 years, the last seven years contain the culmination of all things including the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.
Now, read Geneisis 45 and the same story was documented by Moses. Joseph (another name for Jesus) redeems his family (Israel), so eventually Jesus' our Messiah can ultimately redeem all mankind. There are soo many prefigures of the 'last days' it's impossible to dismiss Genesis 45 an accident. It should be considered history written in advance.
In the ninth year, after becoming Egyptian Overseer, Josepth insists that his entire family Israel, move to live long term in an Goshen, Egypt Oasis( an earthy paradise that prefigures our heavenly home), because 'there are yet five years (of Tribulation) remaining before the famine in Israel is lifted. Joseph repeatedly makes this point 'there are yet five years of famine remaining'
IMHO, we are at the end of year two of the seven years of the tribulation, 'yet five years of famine remain' This 9/11/2010 marks the end of the ninth year of Joseph's vision & dream, it's also prefigures our redemption when we are removed into Heaven. The original 14 years were spoken of in Genesis 45. Do you follow me?
Inside these last five years, the Great Tribulation remains. The rescue of Israel prefigures the removal of the church to the Marriage Supper of the Lamb. That's what I think could happen this month. Rapture, or whatever it's called should happen this month.
Thanks for the ping, buggman.
My own prophetic take on the story of Joseph and his brothers can be found here and here. Let me know what you think.
Shalom.
Show "bash" without a subjective definition. You see, by calling it that, it is you who are doing the bashing.
Ergo, we shouldn't judge someone for traditions that don't annul the Torah.
Good. I didn't. I was simply concise.
It's quite probabole that Rosh Hashannah was the original "New Year"--most Ancient Near Eastern cultures had their new year at about that time.
Most Near Eastern cultures sacrificed their children and drank blood, so I would regard that rationale as unlikely, simply because of all the prohibitions in the Tanakh, 'do not do as the pagans.'
Exactly! Neither can you have it in the middle of the year!
An agricultural season can have it's own "year" with no conflict. It is probable by Deuteronomy 31:10-11 that Shemitta was to begin after Sukkot. I understand the problem with the rains in Israel, particularly in years where Sukkot is late in the solar year.
The argument from the Sh'mitta year actually supports the idea of a Tishri New Year, since it says "at the end," not, "in the middle." Based on that, the rabbis understood "at the end of the year" to refer to Yom Teruah, but that the Sh'mitta would be formally announced at Sukkot, since the latter was a pilgrimage Feast and all Israel would be gathered together, while at Rosh Hashannah most people would still be in their own villages. Furthermore, since a person was supposed to receive gifts from their master when they were released, this would mean that not only could they come to Sukkot as free men, they could come with their own sacrifices and provisions for the Feast.
Pure speculation, which is fine, as long as it is not in conflict with Scripture, which it plainly does (plain meaning comes first in PARDES).
In other words, they interpreted the passage very precisely and in such a way as to show maximum mercy to the poor. Yeshua would approve, I think.
Actually, from what I can discern this particular ruling favored the wealthy. Remember, my principal expertise is in the field of understanding regulatory impact on resource industry economics.
The rabbinic belief that the world began on Rosh Hashannah does come from Scripture, albeit at the midrash or even sod level of interpretation: In Hebrew,
I disagree. What you offer is a construction of Scripture. I prefer to study Scripture root-by-root in a lexicon. You would be amazed at what you might learn. For just a taste I'll tell you that the common understanding of Gen. 4 is completely whacked.
Even many Christian scholars, such as Bishop Unger, have accepted (at least tentatively) the rabbis' view on this matter, so there's no real point in arguing it.
I agree. So stop.
Cool idea, thanks!
Sure.
A music store usually carries them. I used to prefer Bach brand.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.