This one has a poor record when it come to veracity. Even if they could produce the claimed cite it would prove nothing except some incompetent censor or one eager to make a buck got the booklet approved to be published.
It is not church doctrine, nothwithstanding the Nihil Obstat, which only provides “Initial Superficial Assurances” to the faithful. Yet this one salivates like the Pavlovian dog claiming to have made a discovery of sorts. Publishers in past times were able to get other such material past the censors.
This one thinking it is revealing only exposes their ignorance of how the the Bride of Christ functions. They better be more informed of how the justice of Jesus works. Oh that’s right the Sin Of Presumption is their Prideful reply now but what will it be at the day of judgment?.
I can't tell which is more personally offensive; the content of their posts or the expectation that each successive posting be received with alacrity and credulity.
Each new posting is received in context with every previous posting, there are no "do-overs", or "let's pretend that you don't know me's" granted. Each own his own posting history and colors others perceptions of him. Strangers to the truth are expected to remain so. Those who have lied are expected to lie again, those who err are expected to err again.
There is only one reset button that begins with; "O, my God I am heartily sorry for having offended Thee....."