Posted on 08/27/2010 11:45:13 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
The ultimate intention of Catholicism is the restoration of the Holy Roman Empire. That has always been the ambition, at least covertly, but now it is being promoted overtly and openly.
The purpose of this article is only to make that intention clear. It is not a criticism of Catholics or Catholicism (unless you happen to think a Catholic dictatorship is not a good thing).
The most important point is to understand that when a Catholic talks about liberty or freedom, it is not individual liberty that is meant, not the freedom to live one's life as a responsible individual with the freedom to believe as one chooses, not the freedom to pursue happiness, not the freedom to produce and keep what one has produced as their property. What Catholicism means by freedom, is freedom to be a Catholic, in obedience to the dictates of Rome.
The Intentions Made Plain
The following is from the book Revolution and Counter-Revolution:
|
"B. Catholic Culture and Civilization
"Therefore, the ideal of the Counter-Revolution is to restore and promote Catholic culture and civilization. This theme would not be sufficiently enunciated if it did not contain a definition of what we understand by Catholic culture and Catholic civilization. We realize that the terms civilization and culture are used in many different senses. Obviously, it is not our intention here to take a position on a question of terminology. We limit ourselves to using these words as relatively precise labels to indicate certain realities. We are more concerned with providing a sound idea of these realities than with debating terminology.
"A soul in the state of grace possesses all virtues to a greater or lesser degree. Illuminated by faith, it has the elements to form the only true vision of the universe.
"The fundamental element of Catholic culture is the vision of the universe elaborated according to the doctrine of the Church. This culture includes not only the learning, that is, the possession of the information needed for such an elaboration, but also the analysis and coordination of this information according to Catholic doctrine. This culture is not restricted to the theological, philosophical, or scientific field, but encompasses the breadth of human knowledge; it is reflected in the arts and implies the affirmation of values that permeate all aspects of life.
"Catholic civilization is the structuring of all human relations, of all human institutions, and of the State itself according to the doctrine of the Church.
|
Got that? "Catholic civilization is the structuring of all human relations, of all human institutions, and of the State itself according to the doctrine of the Church." The other name for this is called "totalitarianism," the complete rule of every aspect of life.
This book and WEB sites like that where it is found are spreading like wildfire. These people do not believe the hope of America is the restoration of the liberties the founders sought to guarantee, these people believe the only hope for America is Fatima. Really!
In Their Own Words
The following is from the site, "RealCatholicTV." It is a plain call for a "benevolent dictatorship, a Catholic monarch;" their own words. They even suggest that when the "Lord's Payer," is recited, it is just such a Catholic dictatorship that is being prayed for.
[View video in original here or on Youtube. Will not show in FR.]
Two Comments
First, in this country, freedom of speech means that anyone may express any view no matter how much anyone else disagrees with that view, or is offended by it. I totally defend that meaning of freedom of speech.
This is what Catholics believe, and quite frankly, I do not see how any consistent Catholic could disagree with it, though I suspect some may. I have no objection to their promoting those views, because it is what they believe. Quite frankly I am delighted they are expressing them openly. For one thing, it makes it much easier to understand Catholic dialog, and what they mean by the words they use.
Secondly, I think if their views were actually implemented, it would mean the end true freedom, of course, but I do not believe there is any such danger.
Jesus saves all sinners who repent
So, is it your position that all those who repent and accept Jesus as Savior are saved?
This is a pretty clear indication that no proof of nihil obstat will be forthcoming. Surprised?
Context, context, context
This is not a scripture telling us not to judge..it is warning us to judge rightly
Mat 7:1 ¶ Judge not, that ye be not judged.
Mat 7:2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
It is a warning to judge correctly...
All through the gospel Christ actually instructs us to judge fruit..and not to be unequally yoked..(requiring us to make a spiritual judgement)
He tells us not to caste pearls before swine..(also requiring a spiritual judgement)
1Cr 6:2 Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters?
1Cr 6:3 Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?
Every time we present the gospel, we are making a judgement that the person NEEDS to hear it
In this case, hearing the words that came from the mouth of Mother Teresa... one can judge if her testimony was one of a Christian
She needed to hear the good news.. she did not need to try to work her way to salvation
I do hope that before her last breath SOMEONE had the courage to tell her..
I have no intention of helping you in your journey down the baloney trail.
Mad Dawg wrote:
“For a millisecond, let’s put down our disputes and magnify the Lord.”
I hadn’t been following the whole Mother Theresa thing on the thread since I did not think it was a profitable line of discussion for anyone. When one starts to introduce persons and personalities into a dispute about Christian doctrine, objectivity is immediately lost ... and man’s ugly nature will soon make itself known in the exchange. In other words, it not only matters who and what is right, but also how one goes about establishing right.
So, let’s put down our silly, superfluous, superficial, sinful disputes and magnify the Lord. But understand well that the Lord is best and most sincerely magnified when His word and will reign supreme and we acknowledge it.
I especially focus on the posts from the cartoon contributor stressing the UFO, Sister Aimee devotion which causes further embarrassment and immediate disclaimers. .The fruits of their efforts makes excellent apologetic material. These ones serve as the magisterium for the evangelical types.
God bless
1 Timothy 6:4 he is puffed up with conceit, he knows nothing; he has a morbid craving for controversy and for disputes about words, which produce envy, dissension, slander, base suspicions,
I don't understand the meaning of "THEN". First I preach, then I love?
And as to our 'making disciples', you would then refudiate the people that say pastors cannot save? (When asked how many people I'd saved, I always said, "None. GOD saves people, not me.") Sure, we use "making disciples" loosely, but sometimes it's good to tighten up the discourse.
Also, I think we end up needing a generous interpretation of "preaching," one which would include those who do not actually talk much but who serve the needy. Not all are preachers in the formal sense, while all have a call and what we Catholics call an "apostolate."
In man's eyes, many people have done wonderful things, among the worlds religions. These things are well and good and are to be encourgaged with the BIG caveat that good works do not achieve salvation.
Once the caveat is made and agreed to, the philosophical problem remains: Does God act for good in the lives of those who do not profess Christ OR Can folks in that class do no good OR can there be a source of good other than God?
Certainly Mother T. should be commended for her work. Did her work earn her a place in heaven? Not according to the scriptures.
Was anyone saying that her work earned her a place in heaven? Who and where?
Was she a true believer? I don't know.
Is there anything working on earth that could give that knowledge?
Can someone believe that Faith and Works merits salvation? Not according to the scripture.
General observation: Language is a soft instrument. It does not keep an edge and must be sharpened often. But it can be very sharp and very effective, but the edge must be tended to.
It seems to me that I can say that I "merited" reaching the upstairs bedroom by walking down the hall, up the stairs, and through the door. But I sure didn't put the bedroom there or give my legs the power (long pause while elderly widower neighbor comes over from across the street to tell me everything that's wrong with the Church today, where was I ...., oh yeah) to climb them and the origin even of the notion to go upstairs is a mystery. So in SOME sense reaching the upstairs bedroom is the "reward" for my works. In any event it is hard to imagine me reaching the Sealy Posturepedic without going through those steps.
On the other hand, the reward is so disproportionately huge in comparison with the 'effort' while, as I say, though the effort is somehow mine, I can take no credit for it. I might as well try to take credit for the color of my baby-blues.
So the good works which He has prepared for me to walk in seem to have some process, some benefit, some goal and result. But logically prior and of overwhelming importance is the grace which set me on that path, and and for which also I can take no credit.
Moses says, "The LORD will fight for you, and you have only to keep still." I say that keeping still is not so easy.
Still, it is all grace, and to forget that is to forget everything of importance.
Yes, I get verbose sometimes.
This is precisely why I have stopped communicating with, as I refer to him, old veggie. Rather than participate in an exchange of ideas all you will get is criticisms, observations, citations from dubious websites, and a demand for information without reciprocity. It isn't worth the bother.
There are only so many contexts that can support I believe all gods can save
The Spanish Inquisition et al.
Weren’t some Catholics just complaining about quotes of Mother Teresa’s being taken out of context?
How Christlike of them.
Yep....LOL
MD, I assume that you can present us with the proper context . Otherwise this accusation is unfounded and borders on slander
The theological incoherence and spiritual peril of the position held against Mother Teresa is increasingly apparent. Now she is in hell (and now this is a judgment permitted to mortal men), because on the basis of dishonestly excerpted and assembled quotes and a spiritual aridity which is, as I said, Dominically and Scripturally described as a sign of blessedness a case can be made that she had the wrong opinions about Jesus.
Because some Protestants give themselves airs over their good works, they cannot imagine someone who really thinks and feels that even good works are graces, that merit is a gift. Because some Protestants think that when Jesus says "Take up your cross daily," one should feel more ebullient, jolly, and confident than Jesus evidently felt in His crucifixion they conclude from Mother Teresa's desolation, NOT that she was blessed with chastisement and privileged to bear in her heart the marks of Jesus (cf. Gal 6:17), but that she was not given grace.
It is, indeed, consistent with the "snow on a dung hill" notion that God's imputation is somehow impotent to effect real change. This image, whatever it may be intended to mean, suggests that justification is superficial. I mean, work the metaphor! I can enjoy being in heaven and others can enjoy my presence only because my essential nature is dusted with something which looks clean. As long as heaven is too cold for snow to melt, my stench and foul appearance will be concealed. Is this really a suitable metaphor for blessedness?
Our Lord insists that we must carry a cross, that we must die daily. St Paul repeatedly asserts that to be in Christ is to die and to be reborn. Yet when some observe that dreadful and gracious promise coming true, they think it means an absence of grace and faith. But this desolation is their evidence!
Claims are made of a right and duty of spiritual discernment, while the burning way of dross is thought to be not a refinement but a curse.
The Lord is a demanding spouse. He finds us at the curb or in the alley. He insists on washing and clothing us, on having us sleep in unfamiliar beds rather than our vermin infested bundle of rags.
He is a demanding healer. He pokes and prods, debrides, disinfects, and stretches us until we feel our limbs must spring from their sockets.
He is an exigent shepherd, putting us in awkward positions to trim our rotted hooves down to the blood. He runs us through the chutes, and drenches and vaccinates us. And we are tempted by terror when all around us is good and loving care.
He is a stern general who insists his troops be trained and strong and ready, and who means to make them so.
The unchaste and dirty mock. Those lying in their sickness turn away from those being healed. The wild animals with their parasites and short lives scorn the cared-for sheep. Those who do most of their fighting in bars or in their homes belittle the warriors.
The blind claim to see, and so their guilt remains.
MD - there is no need to defend your posting. You eloquently and passionately stated your position with absolute clarity. When the words of Christ and the works of Mother Teresa are misinterpreted no amount of defense will satisfy them.
SOMETIMES
THE COMPULSION TO BE SOOOOOOOOOOO BLAZINGLY WRONG
IS FUNNY.
KEEP IT UP!
It helps paint the fitting absurdities on the RC position.
Have you not read my posts? Text and link are there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.