Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: RockyMtnMan

Separating sex from lifelong married commitment is really a detriment to a society, because it diminishes the basic building block institutions of marriage and family.

So, contraception, in and of itself, is amoral, but how it is used certainly a moral question.


7 posted on 08/27/2010 7:04:26 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: MrB
I don't see anything wrong with family planning for 40+ year olds that have been married for years and have many children. There are specific medical conditions where contraception is absolutely necessary.

It has to be taken on a case by case basis. Having sex out of wed lock is amoral, from a Christian point of view, regardless of contraception. I don't see where contraception is amoral, it is a tool, like a gun, that accomplishes a function. Tools are not amoral but how they are used can be.

12 posted on 08/27/2010 7:12:46 AM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson