You wrote:
“Dumbass: read this, if you know how:”
I think the moderators frown on that sort of language.
“Catholics voted 54% for the big O and protestants 45%. Go pound stand, troll.”
Listen, I realize you probably struggle with these basic language concepts, but here we go again: 300 million Americans; 60 million Catholics. Thus, Protestants put Obama in the White House. Only one in 6 Americans could be a Catholic. Most of the rest are Protestants. They elected Obama. The percentages are meaningless because about 200,000,000 (or even more) people in this country are Protestants. They elected Obama.
Why are the majority of Catholics pro-abortion Obama voters?
If you’re still too dense to see reality, you can take things a step further in drawing an analogy with judaism. You, a catholic upset at protestants for “electing Obama” even though your demographic supported him as a higher percentage, are exactly like a Jew coming to free republic and getting angry at christians of all kinds for electing him—even though the Jew is from a demographic that supported him 80-90%.
While protestants may have elected Obama in sheer number (an utterly meaningless fact, as it merely reflects demographics of the U.S.) more than catholics, what is it about the principles of each that cause catholics to be more LIKELY to vote for him? If you aren’t a sophist you ought to be interested in that question. It is clear by the percentages that CATHOLICISM (i.e., the shared principles of members of the roman church) is more conducive to the Big O than PROTESTANTISM.