” Yet, “the vast majority” is not all is it? I wonder why all of “the issues” aren’t addressed by the many sites provided?”
Your reading comprehension is either off or I didn’t spell it out clearly enough. The one site in particular addresses the vast majority of “the issues”. Actually it may address them all, I don’t bother to look up every single silly thing that the anti-Mormon squad on this board brings up to see exactly where it is addressed.
I think it fairly safe to say that if some “issue” is not found at the one site it can be found on one of the others.
You see, none of these “issues” are anything new. It’s all old and tired and already addressed.
The bottom line for anyone and everyone is,”Is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints the true and restored church?”
Yes. It is.
If you really want to find out. You can know it too.
Well, since you implied my "reading comprehension" may be lacking, I could imply the same about yours or are you addressing your comment to "all"? If the latter, you may want to put the word "all" in the "To:" block next time to prevent a lack of comprehension.
I've clearly stated, I'm an ex-mo, converted to Christianity. I have no further interest in "finding out" anything further related to the mormon church. I have three priorities right now; submit my resignation letter (short term), get my family out of it (mormonISM)(long-term) and to continue my witness about my experiences in the LdS church(very long-term).
The "issues" may be "old and tired" for some. But, most importantly, for those who may be investigating mormonism, they may not be. As many know and have clearly stated and proven, the mormon missionaries and many mormons will NOT discuss the many things posted here. They may be quite revealing to some. (I have noticed a few posts on various threads indicating this to be the case.) For others, such as ourselves, they are not.
Since you continue to parse words and address the posts and posters as "anti-Mormon" vs. anti-mormonISM, is it your contention that we have something personal against mormons (the people themsleves)? If so, can you clearly identify where exactly, any of us have demonstrated that? Otherwise, I interpret the continued use of the phrase as an intentional attempt to marginalize us "anti's" as "haters" of the individuals themselves.
And, to prove your assertion about the "true and restored church", can you show us how and when Christ lost his bride?
If you really want to find out. You can know it too.
But, for some UNKNOWN reason, YOU cannot tell us; but give vague links to scrounge thru, like a dung beetle bringing home supper!