Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop
That is why our founding documents place such a profound emphasis on the bases of human liberty — which can only be sought in God.

Problem is ,they never understood true liberty and freedom because of separation of Church and state -which is an anathema by the Church. So, when you proceed from separating Church from State, liberty and true freedom become distorted and blind people from seeking God by offering sin disguised as freedom.

It should be no surprise to you that true freedom is NOT sex on TV ,abortion , pornography etc.. all protected under the law in the US and called human liberty and freedom

161 posted on 07/27/2010 4:13:42 PM PDT by stfassisi ((The greatest gift God gives us is that of overcoming self"-St Francis Assisi)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]


To: stfassisi; YHAOS; xzins; Alamo-Girl; Quix; RegulatorCountry; marron
It should be no surprise to you that true freedom is NOT sex on TV ,abortion , pornography etc.. all protected under the law in the US and called human liberty and freedom

Well of course it's not, dear brother in Christ! But that is not liberty; that is license. As "permitted" by the overweening State. The sort of license that damns one's soul before God in His good time. The fact is, if we stay close to what the Constitution says, we couldn't be fooled into not drawing the distinction between natural, God-given liberty and human license.

There are NO political solutions to this problem, only spiritual ones.

Still it seems you do not understand the sense of danger that I have in any combination, or fusion, of secular and spiritual authority under any purely human government. In such an organizational arrangement, man's natural propensity for evil will drag down the spiritual life of mankind altogether.

Thus the wisdom of the Holy Bible: "Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's, and unto God what is God's."

To me, this is the true meaning of "the separation of Church and State." It wasn't to remove religious experience and expression from the Public Square; it was to ensure that politicians did not commandeer a person's private conscience for "public purposes."

Or so it seems to me, FWIW.

Thank you for writing, dear brother in Christ!

165 posted on 07/27/2010 4:34:14 PM PDT by betty boop (Those who do not punish bad men are really wishing that good men be injured. — Pythagoras)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson