[mlizzy]

Great news!! If applicable, storm the courts ladies ...

[red tie]

Great! Use the court system against these money making executioners!

[Wolfie]

Scumbag trial lawyers.

[concerned about politics]

This is a great idea. The pro-aborts brainwash mothers into thinking their infants aren't infants. They're more like blobs of green jello or something. Once the mother finds out she brutally dismembered her own infant while it was still alive.......
The child's blood is on her hands. Imagine what these deceived woman must be going through. It's about time (un)Planned Parenthood pays for what it's done - and pays BIG. No amount of money can ever re-do the damage.

[DustyMoment]

Nebraska First to Allow Women to Sue for Psychological Injury After Abortion

Sorry, this is wrong. Those women knew (or should have known) the consequences of their actions!! If they have "psychological" injury as a result of murdering their child, then that's something they will have to live with!!

When you do the wrong thing, you can't get compensated for it.

[Walkingfeather]

Oh now this will put NOW and the abortionist in a pretty bad place. Is is a clear womens health issue, how will they stop it? Brilliant Strategy.

[exDemMom]

The law requires that abortion providers must screen women for risk factors that have been established in the research for a year or more prior to the abortion. Legislators opposing the bill argued that it would be nearly impossible for abortion providers to keep track of all the research on risks factors. The bill's sponsor, Sen. Cap Dierks, disagreed.

Dierks said that a report from the American Psychological Association found that an average of 12 studies per year are published on the subject.

"Surely it’s not too much to ask abortion providers to read 12 studies per year," Dierks said. "Women rightly expect their doctors to keep up to date on their area of specialty. Why would we want the standard of care for abortion to be less than that for other medical procedures?"

It's absolutely ridiculous to argue that it's an undue burden for an abortionist to keep up with current research.

I work with a gynecologist who specializes in oncology. Just to keep her license to practice, she must read several articles discussing the latest in gynecology and take an exam; she must go through this process twice each year, once for her basic gynecology license, once for her oncology speciality.

It's criminal that abortionists should be exempt from the minimal standards other doctors have to meet. Of course, legal abortion never was about patient health or well-being.

[cranked]

Women being allowed to sue AFTER having an abortion.....anyone else seeing the idiotic irony here? =.=

[Non-Sequitur]

And what’s to stop a woman who really wanted the abortion from faking ‘psychological injury’ to get a big payday? This could start a whole cottage industry.

[circlecity]

Although I have no sympathy for abortion providers and like to see anything that makes their life harder, I have reservations about this. It seems to be trying in large part to eliminate any blame against the women who choose to have abortions. You poor thing - blame it on the providers. This in turn shifts the costs from the recipient’s mistake to the providers. In fact the whole system seems designed to shift the psycological costs of abortion from those responsible to those better able to bear them.

[pitviper68]

There’s already an injunction against our new law. Can someone explain to me, why is it that every good law conservatives try to pass, gets blocked by the courts. Yet, liberals’ stupid laws don’t get injuctions against them?

http://omaha.com/article/20100714/NEWS97/707159891
Excerpt:

Judge blocks abortion screening law
By Martha Stoddard
WORLD-HERALD BUREAU

LINCOLN — State attorneys were reviewing their legal options Wednesday after a federal judge stopped a new Nebraska abortion law from taking effect.

U.S. District Judge Laurie Smith Camp said in her ruling that the law would place “substantial, likely insurmountable” obstacles in the way of women seeking abortions in the state.

The order temporarily blocks new requirements for doctors to do extensive screening of women seeking abortions.

The screenings were required under a law, passed as Legislative Bill 594, set to take effect Thursday.

[sportutegrl]

I have always felt that the vast majority of abortions are by girls who have been coerced into it by their lover/boyfriend/abuser. Get the girl alone and ask her if she is doing this of her own free will, or if she is being pressured to do something she may not want to do.

Once men realize that they may not be able to get rid of their baby, maybe they will stop abusing young girls, or maybe they will wait to get married, or maybe they will marry the girl that they got pregnant.

I also think the feminist position should be pro life. Based on my own, non scientific poll, more men than women are pro choice, often for selfish reasons.

[Salvation]

Thanks for posting this. I saw it earlier. Some feathers are going to be ruffled by this!

[Salvation]

**storm the courts ladies ... **

And don’t forget the fathers of these aborted babies who were often left out of the decisions...

[narses]

+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

[denydenydeny]

Suddenly tort reform goes on the Democrat agenda....

[wagglebee]

Pinged from Terri Dailies