Replies

To: the_conscience; Mad Dawg; metmom

There’s a simple test in this case:

Build your syllogism including premise being examined, state this premise as false.

Do the same thing a second time, this time state that premise as true.

If there is no effect on the conclusion, the premise is irrelevant.

6,567 posted on 08/04/2010 1:27:33 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)

To: D-fendr; Mad Dawg; metmom

Correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t Romanist theology make an argument that Immaculate Conception is a necessary precondition to Incarnation?

If that be the case then IC is a necessary premise for Romanists.

6,575 posted on 08/04/2010 1:39:23 PM PDT by the_conscience (We ought to obey God, rather than men. (Acts 5:29b))

To: D-fendr

BTW, I know there are a couple of posts of yours I have not replied to.

Are you interested in my responding to the absurdity of political correctness or the theological issues, or both.

6,579 posted on 08/04/2010 1:45:28 PM PDT by the_conscience (We ought to obey God, rather than men. (Acts 5:29b))

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794