Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Testimony of a Former Irish Priest
BereanBeacon.Org ^ | Richard Peter Bennett

Posted on 07/18/2010 6:04:05 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

The Early Years

Born Irish, in a family of eight, my early childhood was fulfilled and happy. My father was a colonel in the Irish Army until he retired when I was about nine. As a family, we loved to play, sing, and act, all within a military camp in Dublin.

We were a typical Irish Roman Catholic family. My father sometimes knelt down to pray at his bedside in a solemn manner. My mother would talk to Jesus while sewing, washing dishes, or even smoking a cigarette. Most evenings we would kneel in the living room to say the Rosary together. No one ever missed Mass on Sundays unless he was seriously ill. By the time I was about five or six years of age, Jesus Christ was a very real person to me, but so also were Mary and the saints. I can identify easily with others in traditional Catholic nations in Europe and with Hispanics and Filipinos who put Jesus, Mary, Joseph, and other saints all in one boiling pot of faith.

The catechism was drilled into me at the Jesuit School of Belvedere, where I had all my elementary and secondary education. Like every boy who studies under the Jesuits, I could recite before the age of ten five reasons why God existed and why the Pope was head of the only true Church. Getting souls out of Purgatory was a serious matter. The often quoted words, "It is a holy and a wholesome thought to pray for the dead that they may be loosed from sins," were memorized even though we did not know what these words meant. We were told that the Pope as head of the Church was the most important man on earth. What he said was law, and the Jesuits were his right-hand men. Even though the Mass was in Latin, I tried to attend daily because I was intrigued by the deep sense of mystery which surrounded it. We were told it was the most important way to please God. Praying to saints was encouraged, and we had patron saints for most aspects of life. I did not make a practise of that, with one exception: St. Anthony, the patron of lost objects, since I seemed to lose so many things.

When I was fourteen years old, I sensed a call to be a missionary. This call, however, did not affect the way in which I conducted my life at that time. Age sixteen to eighteen were the most fulfilled and enjoyable years a youth could have. During this time, I did quite well both academically and athletically.

I often had to drive my mother to the hospital for treatments. While waiting for her, I found quoted in a book these verses from Mark 10:29-30, "And Jesus answered and said, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my sake, and the gospel's, But he shall receive an hundredfold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands, with persecutions; and in the world to come eternal life." Not having any idea of the true salvation message, I decided that I truly did have a call to be a missionary.

Trying To Earn Salvation I left my family and friends in 1956 to join the Dominican Order. I spent eight years studying what it is to be a monk, the traditions of the Church, philosophy, the theology of Thomas Aquinas, and some of the Bible from a Catholic standpoint. Whatever personal faith I had was institutionalized and ritualized in the Dominican religious system. Obedience to the law, both Church and Dominican, was put before me as the means of sanctification. I often spoke to Ambrose Duffy, our Master of Students, about the law being the means of becoming holy. In addition to becoming "holy," I wanted also to be sure of eternal salvation. I memorized part of the teaching of Pope Pius XII in which he said, "...the salvation of many depends on the prayers and sacrifices of the mystical body of Christ offered for this intention." This idea of gaining salvation through suffering and prayer is also the basic message of Fatima and Lourdes, and I sought to win my own salvation as well as the salvation of others by such suffering and prayer.

In the Dominican monastery in Tallaght, Dublin, I performed many difficult feats to win souls, such as taking cold showers in the middle of winter and beating my back with a small steel chain. The Master of Students knew what I was doing, his own austere life being part of the inspiration that I had received from the Pope's words. With rigor and determination, I studied, prayed, did penance, tried to keep the Ten Commandments and the multitude of Dominican rules and traditions.

Outward Pomp -- Inner Emptiness

Then in 1963 at the age of twenty-five I was ordained a Roman Catholic priest and went on to finish my course of studies of Thomas Aquinas at The Angelicum University in Rome. But there I had difficulty with both the outward pomp and the inner emptiness. Over the years I had formed, from pictures and books, pictures in my mind of the Holy See and the Holy City. Could this be the same city? At the Angelicum University I was also shocked that hundreds of others who poured into our morning classes seemed quite disinterested in theology. I noticed Time and Newsweek magazines being read during classes. Those who were interested in what was being taught seemed only to be looking for either degrees or positions within the Catholic Church in their homelands.

One day I went for a walk in the Colosseum so that my feet might tread the ground where the blood of so many Christians had been poured out. I walked to the arena in the Forum. I tried to picture in my mind those men and women who knew Christ so well that they were joyfully willing to be burned at the stake or devoured alive by beasts because of His overpowering love. The joy of this experience was marred, however, for as I went back in the bus I was insulted by jeering youths shouting words meaning "scum or garbage." I sensed their motivation for such insults was not because I stood for Christ as the early Christians did but because they saw in me the Roman Catholic system. Quickly, I put this contrast out of my mind, yet what I had been taught about the present glories of Rome now seemed very irrelevant and empty.

One night soon after that, I prayed for two hours in front of the main altar in the church of San Clemente. Remembering my earlier youthful call to be a missionary and the hundredfold promise of Mark 10:29-30, I decided not to take the theological degree that had been my ambition since beginning study of the theology of Thomas Aquinas. This was a major decision, but after long prayer I was sure I had decided correctly.

The priest who was to direct my thesis did not want to accept my decision. In order to make the degree easier, he offered me a thesis written several years earlier. He said I could useit as my own if only I would do the oral defense. This turned my stomach. It was similar to what I had seen a few weeks earlier in a city park: elegant prostitutes parading themselves in their black leather boots. What he was offering was equally sinful. I held to my decision, finishing at the University at the ordinary academic level, without the degree.

On returning from Rome, I received official word that I had been assigned to do a three year course at Cork University. I prayed earnestly about my missionary call. To my surprise, I received orders in late August 1964 to go to Trinidad, West Indies, as a missionary.

Pride, Fall, And A New Hunger

On October 1, 1964, I arrived in Trinidad, and for seven years I was a successful priest, in Roman Catholic terms, doing all my duties and getting many people to come to Mass. By 1972 I had become quite involved in the Catholic Charismatic Movement. Then, at a prayer meeting on March 16th of that year, I thanked the Lord that I was such a good priest and requested that if it were His will, He humble me that I might be even better. Later that same evening I had a freak accident, splitting the back of my head and hurting my spine in many places. Without thus coming close to death, I doubt that I would ever have gotten out of my self- satisfied state. Rote, set prayer showed its emptiness as I cried out to God in my pain.

In the suffering that I went through in the weeks after the accident, I began to find some comfort in direct personal prayer. I stopped saying the Breviary (the Roman Catholic Church's official prayer for clergy) and the Rosary and began to pray using parts of the Bible itself. This was a very slow process. I did not know my way through the Bible and the little I had learned over the years had taught me more to distrust it rather than to trust it. My training in philosophy and in the theology of Thomas Aquinas left me helpless, so that coming into the Bible now to find the Lord was like going into a huge dark woods without a map.

When assigned to a new parish later that year, I found that I was to work side-by-side with a Dominican priest who had been a brother to me over the years. For more than two years we were to work together, fully seeking God as best we knew in the parish of Pointe-a-Pierre. We read, studied, prayed, and put into practise what we had been taught in Church teaching. We built up communities in Gasparillo, Claxton Bay, and Marabella, just to mention the main villages. In a Catholic religious sense we were very successful. Many people attended Mass. The Catechism was taught in many schools, including government schools. I continued my personal search into the Bible, but it did not much affect the work we were doing; rather it showed me how little I really knew about the Lord and His Word. It was at this time that Philippians 3:10 became the cry of my heart, "That I may know him, and the power of his resurrection...."

About this time the Catholic Charismatic movement was growing, and we introduced it into most of our villages. Because of this movement, some Canadian Christians came to Trinidad to share with us. I learned much from their messages, especially about praying for healing. The whole impact of what they said was very experience-oriented but was truly a blessing, insofar, as it got me deeply into the Bible as an authority source. I began to compare scripture with scripture and even to quote chapter and verse! One of the texts the Canadians used was Isaiah 53:5, "...and with his stripes we are healed." Yet in studying Isaiah 53, I discovered that the Bible deals with the problem of sin by means of substitution. Christ died in my place. It was wrong for me to try to expidite or try to cooperate in paying the price of my sin.

"If by grace, it is no more of works, otherwise grace is no more grace.." Romans 11:6. "All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all" (Isaiah 53:6).

One particular sin of mine was getting annoyed with people, sometimes even angry. Although I asked forgiveness for my sins, I still did not realize that I was a sinner by the nature which we all inherit from Adam. The scriptural truth is, "As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one" (Romans 3:10), and "For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23). The Catholic Church, however, had taught me that the depravity of man, which is called "original sin," had been washed away by my infant baptism. I still held this belief in my head, but in my heart I knew that my depraved nature had not yet been conquered by Christ.

"That I may know him, and the power of his resurrection..." (Philippians 3:10) continued to be the cry of my heart. I knew that it could be only through His power that I could live the Christian life. I posted this text on the dashboard of my car and in other places. It became the plea that motivated me, and the Lord who is Faithful began to answer.

The Ultimate Question

First, I discovered that God's Word in the Bible is absolute and without error. I had been taught that the Word is relative and that its truthfulness in many areas was to be questioned. Now I began to understand that the Bible could, in fact, be trusted. With the aid of Strong's Concordance, I began to study the Bible to see what it says about itself. I discovered that the Bible teaches clearly that it is from God and is absolute in what it says. It is true in its history, in the promises God has made, in its prophecies, in the moral commands it gives, and in how to live the Christian life. "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works" (II Timothy 3:16-17).

This discovery was made while visiting in Vancouver, B.C., and in Seattle. When I was asked to talk to the prayer group in St. Stephen's Catholic Church, I took as my subject the absolute authority of God's Word. It was the first time that I had understood such a truth or talked about it. I returned to Vancouver, B.C. and in a large parish Church, before about 400 people, I preached the same message. Bible in hand, I proclaimed that "the absolute and final authority in all matters of faith and morals is the Bible, God's own Word."

Three days later, the archbishop of Vancouver, B.C., James Carney, called me to his office. I was then officially silenced and forbidden to preach in his archdiocese. I was told that my punishment would have been more severe, were it not for the letter of recommendation I had received from my own archbishop, Anthony Pantin. Soon afterwards I returned to Trinidad.

Church-Bible Dilemma

While I was still parish priest of Point-a-Pierre, Ambrose Duffy, the man who had so strictly taught me while he was Student Master, was asked to assist me. The tide had turned. After some initial difficulties, we became close friends. I shared with him what I was discovering. He listened and commented with great interest and wanted to find out what was motivating me. I saw in him a channel to my Dominican brothers and even to those in the Archbishop's house.

When he died suddenly of a heart attack, I was stricken with grief. In my mind, I had seen Ambrose as the one who could make sense out of the Church-Bible dilemma with which I so struggled. I had hoped that he would have been able to explain to me and then to my Dominican brothers the truths with which I wrestled. I preached at his funeral and my despair was very deep.

I continued to pray Philippians 3:10, "That I may know him, and the power of his resurrection...." But to learn more about Him, I had first to learn about myself as a sinner. I saw from the Bible (I Timothy 2:5) that the role I was playing as a priestly mediator -- exactly what the Catholic Church teaches but exactly opposite to what the Bible teaches -- was wrong. I really enjoyed being looked up to by the people and, in a certain sense, being idolized by them. I rationalized my sin by saying that after all, if this is what the biggest Church in the world teaches, who am I to question it? Still, I struggled with the conflict within. I began to see the worship of Mary, the saints, and the priests for the sin that it is. But while I was willing to renounce Mary and the saints as mediators, I could not renounce the priesthood, for in that I had invested my whole life.

Tug-Of-War Years

Mary, the saints, and the priesthood were just a small part of the huge struggle with which I was working. Who was Lord of my life, Jesus Christ in His Word or the Roman Church? This ultimate question raged inside me especially during my last six years as parish priest of Sangre Grande (1979-1985). That the Catholic Church was supreme in all matters of faith and morals had been dyed into my brain since I was a child. It looked impossible ever to change.

Rome was not only supreme but always called "Holy Mother." How could I ever go against "Holy Mother," all the more so since I had an official part in dispensing her sacraments and keeping people faithful to her? In 1981, I actually rededicated myself to serving the Roman Catholic Church while attending a parish renewal seminar in New Orleans. Yet when I returned to Trinidad and again became involved in real life problems, I began to return to the authority of God's Word. Finally the tension became like a tug-of-war inside me. Sometimes I looked to the Roman Church as being absolute, sometimes to the authority of the Bible as being final. My stomach suffered much during those years; my emotions were being torn. I ought to have known the simple truth that one cannot serve two masters. My working position was to place the absolute authority of the Word of God under the supreme authority of the Roman Church.

This contradiction was symbolized in what I did with the four statues in the Sangre Grande Church. I removed and broke the statues of St. Francis and St. Martin because the second commandment of God's Law declares in Exodus 20:4, "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image...." But when some of the people objected to my removal of the statues of the Sacred Heart and of Mary, I left them standing because the higher authority, i.e., the Roman Catholic Church, said in its law Canon 1188: "The practise of displaying sacred images in the churches for the veneration of the faithful is to remain in force."

I did not see that what I was trying to do was to make God's Word subject to man's word. My Own Fault While I had learned earlier that God's Word is absolute, I still went through this agony of trying to maintain the Roman Catholic Church as holding more authority than God's Word, even in issues where the Church of Rome was saying the exact opposite to what was in the Bible.

How could this be? First of all, it was my own fault. If I had accepted the authority of the Bible as supreme, I would have been convicted by God's Word to give up my priestly role as mediator, but that was too precious to me. Second, no one ever questioned what I did as a priest.

Christians from overseas came to Mass, saw our sacred oils, holy water, medals, statues, vestments, rituals, and never said a word! The marvelous style, symbolism, music, and artistic taste of the Roman Church was all very captivating. Incense not only smells pungent, but to the mind it spells mystery.

The Turning Point

One day, a woman challenged me (the only Christian ever to challenge me in all my 22 years as a priest), "You Roman Catholics have a form of godliness, but you deny its power." Those words bothered me for some time because the lights, banners, folk music, guitars, and drums were dear to me. Probably no priest on the whole island of Trinidad had as colorful robes, banners, and vestments as I had. Clearly I did not apply what was before my eyes.

In October 1985, God's grace was greater than the lie that I was trying to live. I went to Barbados to pray over the compromise that I was forcing myself to live. I felt truly trapped. The Word of God is absolute indeed. I ought to obey it alone; yet to the very same God I had vowed obedience to the supreme authority of the Catholic Church. In Barbados I read a book in which was explained the Biblical meaning of Church as "the fellowship of believers." In the New Testament there is no hint of a hierarchy; "Clergy" lording it over the "laity" is unknown. Rather, it is as the Lord Himself declared "...one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren" (Matthew 23:8).

Now to see and to understand the meaning of church as "fellowship" left me free to let go of the Roman Catholic Church as supreme authority and depend on Jesus Christ as Lord. It began to dawn on me that in Biblical terms, the Bishops I knew in the Catholic Church were not Biblical believers. They were for the most part pious men taken up with devotion to Mary and the Rosary and loyal to Rome, but not one had any idea of the finished work of salvation, that Christ's work is done, that salvation is personal and complete. They all preached penance for sin, human suffering, religious deeds, "the way of man" rather than the Gospel of grace. But by God's grace I saw that it was not through the Roman Church nor by any kind of works that one is saved, "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast" (Ephesians 2:8-9).

New Birth at Age 48

I left the Roman Catholic Church when I saw that life in Jesus Christ was not possible while remaining true to Roman Catholic doctrine. In leaving Trinidad in November 1985, I only reached neighboring Barbados. Staying with an elderly couple, I prayed to the Lord for a suit and necessary money to reach Canada, for I had only tropical clothing and a few hundred dollars to my name. Both prayers were answered without making my needs known to anyone except the Lord.

From a tropical temperature of 90 degrees, I landed in snow and ice in Canada. After one month in Vancouver, I came to the United States of America. I now trusted that He would take care of my many needs, since I was beginning life anew at 48 years of age, practically penniless, without an alien resident card, without a driver's license, without a recommendation of any kind, having only the Lord and His Word.

I spent six months with a Christian couple on a farm in Washington State. I explained to my hosts that I had left the Roman Catholic Church and that I had accepted Jesus Christ and His Word in the Bible as all-sufficient. I had done this, I said, "absolutely, finally, definitively, and resolutely." Yet far from being impressed by these four adverbs, they wanted to know if there was any bitterness or hurt inside me. In prayer and in great compassion, they ministered to me, for they themselves had made the transition and knew how easily one can become embittered. Four days after I arrived in their home, by God's grace I began to see in repentance the fruit of salvation. This meant being able not only to ask the Lord's pardon for my many years of compromising but also to accept His healing where I had been so deeply hurt. Finally, at age 48, on the authority of God's Word alone, by grace alone, I accepted Christ's substitutionary death on the Cross alone. To Him alone be the glory.

Having been refurbished both physically and spiritually by this Christian couple together with their family, I was provided a wife by the Lord, Lynn, born-again in faith, lovely in manner, intelligent in mind. Together we set out for Atlanta, Georgia, where we both got jobs.

A Real Missionary With A Real Message

In September 1988, we left Atlanta to go as missionaries to Asia. It was a year of deep fruitfulness in the Lord that once I would never have thought was possible. Men and women came to know the authority of the Bible and the power of Christ's death and resurrection. I was amazed at how easy it is for the Lord's grace to be effective when only the Bible is used to present Jesus Christ. This contrasted with the cobwebs of church tradition that had so clouded my 21 years in missionary garments in Trinidad, 21 years without the real message.

To explain the abundant life of which Jesus spoke and which I now enjoy, no better words could be used than those of Romans 8:1-2: "There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death." It is not just that I have been freed from the Roman Catholic system, but that I have become a new creature in Christ. It is by the grace of God, and nothing but His grace, that I have gone from dead works into new life.

Testimony to the Gospel of Grace

Back in 1972, when some Christians had taught me about the Lord healing our bodies, how much more helpful it would have been had they explained to me on what authority our sinful nature is made right with God. The Bible clearly shows that Jesus substituted for us on the cross. I cannot express it better than Isaiah 53:5: "But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed." (This means that Christ took on himself what I ought to suffer for my sins. Before the Father, I trust in Jesus as my substitute.)

That was written 750 years before the crucifixion of our Lord. A short time after the sacrifice of the cross, the Bible states in I Peter 2:24: "Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed."

Because we inherited our sin nature from Adam, we have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. How can we stand before a Holy God -- except in Christ -- and acknowledge that He died where we ought to have died? God gives us the faith to be born again, making it possible for us to acknowledge Christ as our substitute. It was Christ who paid the price for our sins: sinless, yet He was crucified. This is the true Gospel message. Is faith enough? Yes, born-again faith is enough. That faith, born of God, will result in good works including repentance: "For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them" (Ephesians 2:10).

In repenting, we put aside, through God's strength, our former way of life and our former sins. It does not mean that we cannot sin again, but it does mean that our position before God has changed. We are called children of God, for so indeed we are. If we do sin, it is a relationship problem with the Father which can be resolved, not a problem of losing our position as a child of God in Christ, for this position is irrevocable. In Hebrews 10:10, the Bible says it so wonderfully: "...we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all."

The finished work of Christ Jesus on the Cross is sufficient and complete. As you trust solely in this finished work, a new life which is born of the Spirit will be yours -- you will be born again.

The Present Day

My present task: the good work that the Lord has prepared for me to do is as an evangelist situated in the Pacific Northwest of the U.S.A. What Paul said about his fellow Jews I say about my dearly loved Catholic brothers: my heart's desire and prayer to God for Catholics is that they may be saved. I can testify about them that they are zealous for God, but their zeal is not based in God's Word but in their church tradition. If you understand the devotion and agony that some of our brothers and sisters in the Philippines and South America have put into their religion, you may understand my heart's cry: "Lord, give us a compassion to understand the pain and torment of the search our brothers and sisters have made to please You. In understanding pain inside the Catholic hearts, we will have the desire to show them the Good News of Christ's finished work on the Cross."

My testimony shows how difficult it was for me as a Catholic to give up Church tradition, but when the Lord demands it in His Word, we must do it. The "form of godliness" that the Roman Catholic Church has makes it most difficult for a Catholic to see where the real problem lies. Everyone must determine by what authority we know truth. Rome claims that it is only by her own authority that truth is known. In her own words, Cannon 212, Section 1, "The Christian faithful, conscious of their own responsibility, are bound by Christian obedience to follow what the sacred pastors, as representatives of Christ, declare as teachers of the faith or determine as leaders of the Church." (Vatican Council II based, Code of Canon Law promulgated by Pope John-Paul II, 1983).

Yet according to the Bible, it is God's Word itself which is the authority by which truth is known. It was man-made traditions which caused the Reformers to demand "the Bible only, faith only, grace only, in Christ only, and to God only be the glory."

The Reason Why I Share

I share these truths with you now so that you can know God's way of salvation. Our basic fault as Catholics is that we believe that somehow we can of ourselves respond to the help God gives us to be right in His sight. This presupposition that many of us have carried for years is aptly defined in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1994) #2021, "Grace is the help God gives us to respond to our vocation of becoming his adopted sons...."

With that mindset, we were unknowingly holding to a teaching that the Bible continually condemns. Such a definition of grace is man's careful fabrication, for the Bible consistently declares that the believer's right standing with God is "without works" (Romans 4:6), "without the deeds of the Law" (Romans 3:28), "not of works" (Ephesians 2:9), "It is the gift of God," (Ephesians 2:8). To attempt to make the believer's response part of his salvation and to look upon grace as "a help" is to flatly deny Biblical truth,

"...if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace..." (Romans 11:6). The simple Biblical message is that "the gift of righteousness" in Christ Jesus is a gift, resting on His all-sufficient sacrifice on the cross, "For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ" (Romans 5:17).

So it is as Christ Jesus Himself said, He died in place of the believer, the One for many (Mark 10:45), His life a ransom for many. As He declared, ...this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins" (Matthew 26:28). This is also what Peter proclaimed, "For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that He might bring us to God..." (I Peter 3:18).

Paul's preaching is summarized at the end of II Corinthians 5:21, "For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.." (II Cor. 5:21).

This fact, dear reader, is presented clearly to you in the Bible. Acceptance of it is now commanded by God, "...Repent ye, and believe the gospel" (Mark 1:15).

The most difficult repentance for us dyed-in-the-wool Catholics is changing our mind from thoughts of "meriting," "earning," "being good enough," simply to accepting with empty hands the gift of righteousness in Christ Jesus. To refuse to accept what God commands is the same sin as that of the religious Jews of Paul's time, "For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God." (Romans 10:3)

Repent and believe the Good News!

Richard Bennett

A native of Ireland he returned there in 1996 on an evangelistic tour. He now lives in Portland Oregon U.S.A. He teaches a workshop at Multnomah Bible College on "Catholicism in the Light of Biblical Truth." His greatest joy is door-to-door witnessing . He has produced three series of radio broadcasts. A fourth series is about to begin in the Philippines on D.W.T.I. and D.V. R .O. radio stations. He is co-editor of this book and founder of the ministry named "Berean Beacon."


TOPICS: Catholic; Evangelical Christian; Ministry/Outreach
KEYWORDS: catholic; ireland; irish; priest; undeadthread
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 7,341-7,3607,361-7,3807,381-7,400 ... 7,601-7,615 next last
To: MarkBsnr

Sorry MarkBsnr, I mentioned you and did not ping you.


7,361 posted on 08/06/2010 7:25:56 PM PDT by marbren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7359 | View Replies]

To: marbren
REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY.

I'll bite, is this the idea that the church has replaced Israel? I'm not conversant in it for a couple of reasons.

First:Hebrews 9:27

27Just as man is destined to die once, and after that to face judgment,

It doesn't affect me.

Second: As noted upthread, I am kept by Jesus as a believer, nothing can take me from His hand. I am His. All the eschatology business doesn't matter to me. Rapture or not, death before the Second Coming of Christ or not, I am the Lord's. Either way, in one case I will see Jesus returning as a member of the Church Militant or the Church Victorious.

7,362 posted on 08/06/2010 7:51:29 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7359 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr
Trying? What do you mean trying? Are you saying that God is not Almighty? That God can fail when dealing with His creations?

That's all you got out of that???

7,363 posted on 08/06/2010 8:02:07 PM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7354 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change
Thank you for sharing your view, dear count-your-change!

No. the titles applied to the Messiah properly fit Christ Jesus and do not refer to the Father or holy spirit.

We shall continue to disagree then because I see the Names "Wonderful" "The Mighty God" and "The Everlasting Father" applying to the Father as well as the Son.

And I see the Names "Wonderful" and "Counsellor" applying to the Spirit as well as the Son.

For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. – Isaiah 9:6

God's Name is I AM.

7,364 posted on 08/06/2010 8:11:52 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7261 | View Replies]

To: xone

What if Martin Luther was also apathetic about REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY as first taught by the Roman Catholic Church. Remember, this is the same group that brought us the ideas of coredemtrix Mary and immaculate conception. Is there a chance Luther became antisemitic? Did Hitler use any of Luther’s ideas about Jews? What if the key to understanding the times we live in understanding the roles of Israel and the Church? Speaking of the times we live in, I know exactly what I am going to do when a loaf of bread is $5000.


7,365 posted on 08/06/2010 8:20:18 PM PDT by marbren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7362 | View Replies]

To: marbren
Is there a chance Luther became antisemitic?

He expressed like many in his day views that are antisemitic. Was he? He followed Christ, listened and studied the words of the Apostles all of whom were Jewish. I believe he was frustrated the Jews of the day didn't convert.

Did Hitler use any of Luther’s ideas about Jews?

Are you asking if Luther called for the extermination of the subhuman Jewish nation man, women, child. If so, no. Did Hitler do what Hitler wanted in relation to the Jews, yeah. While he needed no other inspiration some Nazis consulted with the Grand Mufti to see how Muslims dealt with Jews. In case you don't know, Hitler was an evil man. I doubt he needed others to make him that way.

What if the key to understanding the times we live in understanding the roles of Israel and the Church?

What if it is? So what? Can you escape the times? No. What is the task of a Christian? To try and predict what will happen next in the world? Not according to Christ. We should know the times, so we can use our time on earth to spread the Gospel, to reach souls for Christ. The Bible says that the time is short many times, are you going to spend that time deciphering events trying to discern an unknowable date, or keep your lamp full of oil awaiting your Redeemer doing His work that you were meant to do. You can't stop time, you can only use the time you have wisely in the service of your King, not trying to be the first one on the block to win the Second Coming pool. For a hymn reference try Hark the Voice of Jesus Calling

I know exactly what I am going to do when a loaf of bread is $5000.

So do I, eat something else. Seriously, do you think you will add a day to your life worrying about these things in the context of your time on this earth? Remember the parable of the rich farmer who would tear down his own barns and build new ones to store his increase and have sustenance to last him a long time. He was a fool, as his soul was demanded of him the day he finished his preparations.

What if Martin Luther was also apathetic about REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY as first taught by the Roman Catholic Church. Remember, this is the same group that brought us the ideas of coredemtrix Mary and immaculate conception.

Neither of which is Lutheran doctrine. Replacement theology saves no one. Delivering the Gospel, the Word of God can save. Where do you want your effort noted.

7,366 posted on 08/06/2010 8:59:39 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7365 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
What about the guy who is two blocks over that isn't your neighbor???

In that case it depends on his political affiliation.

7,367 posted on 08/07/2010 5:59:16 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7329 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

I think maybe you do not understand the nature of discourse among people of varying views? Just asking how it looks like from over there is no indication that the same thing is being viewed from over here.

Those quotes neither answer the question I am asking nor explain your opinion to someone who has questions about it.

I mean this: We papists can look at a text in I John and triumphantly wave it about as ‘proof’ that there is a Biblical distinction between mortal and venial sin. Guess what. Our opponents will not be persuaded. We have to do more if we are to make out point clear and believable.

Similarly, those texts may ‘prove’ something to you, but they are not clear answers to my question. If I work at it, I can see that you are saying something like, “If you have to ask if you are saved, you aren’t.”

But there are ample texts which SEEM to propose the idea that one could be like St. Paul and still lose out at the end; one could call on the name of the Lord but still be denied by Him at the end; one could be summoned before Him and be sent away not on the basis of ‘faith’ but on thee mercy shown to the least of His brethren.

In one of those collections of “I was was not a Catholic and now I am,” stories a young lady got “saved” many times because she was not SURE she was saved.

Now I can read that as possibly some kind of psychiatric disorder, depression or somesuch. Because of such illnesses, I hesitate to tell somebody a feeling or an assurance of some kind is diagnostic of one’s soul’s health. For some of us, faith, is an “infused virtue” a given strength which we have to exercise with determination while our family, friends, and internal chemistry cry out against it.

Such folks to not FEEL assurance. They clutch to the proposition that God loves them, in spite of the shrieking witnesses to the contrary, NOT because they FEEL loved but, well, for some other reason. [Hint: grace.] They hold on though beset by doubts and uncertainties. IMHO their faith is a true miracle because it is unaccompanied by any ease or satisfaction. They truly keep their eyes on the prize.


7,368 posted on 08/07/2010 6:16:36 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7318 | View Replies]

To: smvoice

I think one problem with the “forensic not infused righteousness” view is that it SEEMS to separate reality from, um, let’s say classification.

If God “imputes” righteousness to me, simply, then what does righteousness mean? This is one of those pesky ‘leaning to my own understanding’ things. If we say “God is righteous,” or even “God is righteousness” we are appealing (at least so it seems) to a concept “righteousness” which we generally think has a meaning apart from Divinity. Otherwise the statement is really “God is I know not what.”

That’s one hint of a line of enquiry. Here’s another:

God’s word is active, efficacious. He has but to SAY “Let there be light,” and — shazam! — the utility bill is in the mail!

So I suggest that (I’m not saying this is a new idea to anyone) when God imputes righteousness it’s just a matter of moving the sinner out of pen A into pen B. The very idea that the Ruler of the universe loves me just because helps me toward righteousness. The imputation returns not empty but waters my soul bringing forth good things.

Gimme some feedback, please. I’m just tossing stuff in the air here.


7,369 posted on 08/07/2010 6:25:14 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7327 | View Replies]

To: smvoice
We can KNOW we have eternal life. Not have to guess whether it's so.

Let us read the chapter in context.

1 John 5: 6 This is the one who came through water and blood, 2 Jesus Christ, not by water alone, but by water and blood. The Spirit is the one that testifies, and the Spirit is truth. 7 So there are three that testify, 8 the Spirit, the water, and the blood, and the three are of one accord. 9 If we accept human testimony, the testimony of God is surely greater. Now the testimony of God is this, that he has testified on behalf of his Son. 10 Whoever believes in the Son of God has this testimony within himself. Whoever does not believe God has made him a liar by not believing the testimony God has given about his Son. 11 And this is the testimony: God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. 12 Whoever possesses the Son has life; whoever does not possess the Son of God does not have life.

13 3 I write these things to you so that you may know that you have eternal life, you who believe in the name of the Son of God. 14 And we have this confidence in him, that if we ask anything according to his will, he hears us. 15 And if we know that he hears us in regard to whatever we ask, we know that what we have asked him for is ours. 16 If anyone sees his brother sinning, if the sin is not deadly, he should pray to God and he will give him life. This is only for those whose sin is not deadly. There is such a thing as deadly sin, about which I do not say that you should pray. 17 All wrongdoing is sin, but there is sin that is not deadly. 18 We know that no one begotten by God sins; but the one begotten by God he protects, and the evil one cannot touch him. 19 We know that we belong to God, and the whole world is under the power of the evil one. 20 We also know that the Son of God has come and has given us discernment to know the one who is true. And we are in the one who is true, in his Son Jesus Christ. He is the true God and eternal life. 21 Children, be on your guard against idols.

This passage here is an exhortation. Notice the mixture of - testify, accord, may know, confidence, discernment, etc. This is a rah rah speech, closing out the letter. This is not surety, it is conditional. What do I mean by that?

- 11 And this is the testimony: God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. 12 Whoever possesses the Son has life; whoever does not possess the Son of God does not have life.

Conditional: each man must possess (which is not the same as just believing) the Son.

- 13 3 I write these things to you so that you may know that you have eternal life, you who believe in the name of the Son of God.

Conditional: each must believe in the name of the Son of God before eternal life may be known. It does not say that this is the only prerequisite, just one of them.

- 14 And we have this confidence in him, that if we ask anything according to his will, he hears us. 15 And if we know that he hears us in regard to whatever we ask, we know that what we have asked him for is ours.

This says that He will grant us things only if it is His will. So, we know that He will do things according to His will, but just in fancier language. Not quite a Pauline sales job, but better than average.

- 16 If anyone sees his brother sinning, if the sin is not deadly, he should pray to God and he will give him life. This is only for those whose sin is not deadly. There is such a thing as deadly sin, about which I do not say that you should pray.

Should pray. So if I pray for somebody, then as long as the sin is not deadly, a one time prayer from me will save my brother's worthless carcass, right? Am I the saviour of my brother, in this instance? What if I pray for my brother, and then on the next occasion of him sinning, pray for him again? Is my brother saved twice? Does he go to the second level of Heaven? That is why one must take the verses in context.

- 18 We know that no one begotten by God sins; but the one begotten by God he protects, and the evil one cannot touch him.

Obvious reference to Jesus here, but do those John is writing to get it? Or might they think that it could refer to them? Or is John exhorting them not to sin, with this line referring to behaviours?

- 19 We know that we belong to God, and the whole world is under the power of the evil one. 20 We also know that the Son of God has come and has given us discernment to know the one who is true. And we are in the one who is true, in his Son Jesus Christ. He is the true God and eternal life. 21 Children, be on your guard against idols.

Closing the deal here, and appealing to the sense of Christian community as against the pagans and Jews who do not know the One who is true.

7,370 posted on 08/07/2010 6:26:36 AM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7342 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
I would *think* dissing one’s mother would be somewhat of a violation of “honor thy father and thy mother.”

I dont think a mild rebuke is a sin. Obviously, however the Savior meant it, it was NOT sin. Jesus WAS sinless.

7,371 posted on 08/07/2010 6:32:48 AM PDT by bkaycee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7340 | View Replies]

To: xone
I left out the 'perhaps' from an earlier posting I had made. Mark, you have to face the fact that others who fell into the hands of the Catholics during those times didn't always fare well.

I must have missed it. Thanks for clearing it up. It is true that the level of Catholic hospitality varied slightly.

I'm glad Martin didn't obey the summons. I'm not sure the Catholics had the reach where he lived without deniability.

Are you kidding? The only reason that we know that Henry VIII was able to catch and have Tyndale killed was because he was open and bragged about it and had him brought to trial. If he kept his mouth shut and simply had him assassinated, a common act in those times, then Tyndale's death would have been a complete mystery.

Perhaps without sanction if only for the reason he was costing some of them good commissions.

Fact: the Church did not have him assassinated.

7,372 posted on 08/07/2010 6:34:35 AM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7358 | View Replies]

To: marbren; xone
xone, I got one that I believe you and Martin Luther and MarkBsnr agree on, REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY.

Really? Vatican II confirmed once again that the Jewish People are special in God's eyes and separate from all the other nations. Paul, in Romans 9 and 11, speaks at length on the subject.

If xone rejects Replacement theology, then we agree. If he does not, then we disagree.

7,373 posted on 08/07/2010 6:42:36 AM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7359 | View Replies]

To: bkaycee

Then “disrespecting” (dissing) wouldn’t be correct. Correct?


7,374 posted on 08/07/2010 6:43:26 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7371 | View Replies]

To: bkaycee
Obviously, however the Savior meant it, it was NOT sin. Jesus WAS sinless. Yes, He honored his father and His mother.

Which becomes a problem when some interpret these scriptures in error.

7,375 posted on 08/07/2010 6:45:41 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7371 | View Replies]

To: bkaycee
Obviously, however the Savior meant it, it was NOT sin. Jesus WAS sinless.

Yes, He honored his father and His mother.

Which becomes a problem when some interpret these scriptures in error.

7,376 posted on 08/07/2010 6:46:30 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7371 | View Replies]

To: xone
Please stick with Christians.

It would be interesting to try to figure out who are really Christians and who aren't. For example, are the LDS any less Christian than Oneness Pentecostals? How about Christian Science? What about John Hagee? The Children of God? Jim Jones' People's Temple? David Koresh's Branch Davidians?

Or you could get really orthodox and limit it to the Catholics. Where might you draw the line?

7,377 posted on 08/07/2010 6:58:15 AM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7360 | View Replies]

To: xone
REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY.

I see. Thanks for the explanation as to your beliefs.

7,378 posted on 08/07/2010 6:59:55 AM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7362 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
That's all you got out of that???

Not all. But I consider this significant: that you believe that the Holy Spirit "tries", in effect saying that the Holy Spirit is not enough and that something else is required for one's salvation.

7,379 posted on 08/07/2010 7:02:17 AM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7363 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
I'm still unclear how this jibes with Paul. If you do what Paul lists, can you still inherit the Kingdom? Or is that if you do them and then repent you can? Or that if you do these acts you haven't repented? Or that if you are already saved, you won't do these acts at all?

When God regenerates us, we are forgiven eternally, we are forgiven of all sin, past, present, future.

We are made Children of God when we were dead in trespasses and sin. We were children of wrath, enemies of God but now we have BEEN adopted as CHILDREN.

Paul's description talks about those WHO LIVE in sin, not those who fight against sin and occasionally lose.

Those who have been adopted, have been forgiven for ALL SIN, including future sin. Some might say, then we can sin all we want. Paul answers this objection in Rom 6! The True Gospel brings this objection as testified by Paul who answers the objection.

We are GIVEN ETERNAL LIFE, NOT CONDITIONAL LIFE. Eternal life by definition can never end. If it CAN end, it IS NOT Eternal.

When we sin against the Father, the fellowship has been marred. We confess our sin and restore fellowship with the Father. Just like any earthly family. If I wrong my Dad, there are bad feelings between us, until I confess and apologize for my wrong and restore a loving relationship.

God will not dissown His Children but will chastise them, like any good parent.

Bringing up future possible sin in regards to salvation, makes salvation based on works, which is certainly not biblical.

Jesus came to Save Sinners, not those trying to justify themselves. Works to keep salvation, denies the all sufficient sacrafice.

7,380 posted on 08/07/2010 7:04:20 AM PDT by bkaycee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7321 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 7,341-7,3607,361-7,3807,381-7,400 ... 7,601-7,615 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson