Uh, wot I said: The merits of the article do not exist. It’s filled with innuendo. It makes no argument.
It’s not evenhanded.
Get that.
YOU are wrong to say that the article’s merits are its evenhandedness.
It’s not evenhanded.
Innuendo is not evenhanded.
Is that sufficiently merit-based for you?
You wrote:
“Let’s please discuss the merits of the article and not make it personal.”
Anti-Catholic hatred on the part of people who are obessed with posting articles bashing the Church or pope over decades old child abuse cases (or even more recent ones) tends to make it personal. People like that clearly have a personal agenda so what do you expect?