Did you read the article?
Do you not agree that the Vatican’s bureaucracy and inability to uniformly apply cannon law caused delays when it came to the handling of abuse cases?
You wrote:
“Did you read the article?”
Only part of it. It didn’t seem necessary to read more.
“Do you not agree that the Vatican’s bureaucracy and inability to uniformly apply cannon law caused delays when it came to the handling of abuse cases?”
Nope - because there is no such thing as cannon law. I suggest you learn how to spell “canon” before you make statements or ask questions about it.
Yes I agree with that part. Most Catholics will agree that canon law as civil and criminal law can be slow, frustrating and often not as effective as we like. But that is not the point of the article. The point of the article is to lay this problem at then Cardinal Ratziner, now Pope Benedict’s feet.