Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ANNE ASKEW (1520 – 1546) A Daughter of the Reformation
Anne Askew: Brave Daughter of the English Reformation, Christian Family Publications, 1999 Heroes of ^ | 06/17/2010 | Gene Fedele

Posted on 06/17/2010 3:53:24 PM PDT by RnMomof7

Anne was born during the reign of King Henry VIII to an honoured knight, Sir William Askew.

Anne was described as attractive in form and faith, a beautiful and high-spirited young woman, well educated, with unusual gifts, and “very pious.” Her father arranged that she should be married to the son of a friend, Thomas Kyme, to whom her deceased sister had originally been promised.

Anne endeavored to be a faithful wife, and bore her husband two children. However, despite an initially happy marriage, her husband, Kyme, threw her out of the home because of her Protestant Faith. Anne had acquired a copy of the English Bible and had studied it enthusiastically. She abandoned her formal Catholic religion for the life-changing Protestant Faith in a personal Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ. Her enthusiastic witness drew the attention of the priests who warned her husband about her “sedition.” When challenged she confessed that she was no longer a Romanist, but “a daughter of the Reformation”. At this, her husband threw her out of the home. However, he acknowledge that he had never known a more devout woman than Anne.

In 1545, Anne was examined by church leaders concerning her beliefs. Her answers were full of wisdom and quotes from the Holy Scriptures, and she often out-maneuvered the inquisitors pointing out the contradictions in their own position. This only served to enrage them more. Lord Bonner was determined to see her burned for heresy. After failing to prove any heresy, he resorted to insinuating that she was immoral. Looking him full in the face, Anne answered calmly: “I would, my lord, that all men knew my conversation and living in all points; for I am so sure of myself this hour, that there is none able to prove any dishonesty in me. If you know any who can do it, I pray you bring them forth.”

He could not find anyone who could question her morals, and so he had to have her released.

Thomas Wriothesley, the lord Chancellor of England, was determined to crush the Reformation. He summoned her before the council and subjected her to an examination that lasted five hours. One of the council, Mr. Paget, challenged Anne: “How can you avoid the very words of Christ, take, eat, this is My Body which is broken for you?” Anne answered: “Christ’s meaning in that passage is similar to the meaning of those other places of Scripture, ‘I am the door’, ‘I am the vine’. ‘Behold the Lamb of God.’ ‘That rock was Christ.’ And other such references to Himself. We are not in these texts to take Christ for the material thing which He is signified by, for then we will make Him a door, a vine, a lamb, a stone, quite contrary to the Holy Ghost’s meaning. All these indeed signify Christ, even as the bread signifies His body in that place.”

She was charged and imprisoned in Newgate Prison. Her enemies were determined to see her burn. On 28 June, she was taken to Guild Hall to be examined again by the council. She was taunted with being a heretic. She responded that she had done nothing for which the Law of God required her death. When asked directly if she denied the doctrine of Transubstantiation, that the sacrament of the Eucharist was the actual body and blood of Christ, Anne responded: “God is a spirit, not a wafer cake. He is to be worshipped in spirit and in truth – John 4:24 – and not by the impious superstitious homage paid to a wafer converted, by popish jugglery, into a god.” That very day, 28 June, the council condemned Anne Askew to be burned to death at the stake.

However, before that sentence was to be carried out, Lord Wriothesley ordered her to be stretched on the rack. As the levers were turned and the torture began, Anne remained silent. Wriothesley was so angered by his lack of success that he ordered the torture to be increased. Then the officer of the rack was so moved by the sight of this pious woman enduring such torture in silence, he refused to intensify the torture. Wriothesley himself grabbed the levers and mercilessly stretched her body until her joints were pulled asunder and her bones were broken. Yet, despite the intense sufferings, all the cruelties of her enemies failed to change the patience sweetness of Anne’s Christian demeanor.

When the day of her execution arrived, Anne was so crippled as a result of her tortures on the rack that she had to be carried in a chair to the stake. One who witnessed her death wrote: “She had an angel’s countenance and a smiling face.” She was offered one last chance at a pardon if she would renounce the doctrines of the Reformation and embrace Catholicism. This she boldly refused. “I believe all those Scriptures to be true which He hath confirmed with His most precious blood. Yea, and, as St. Paul sayeth, those Scriptures are sufficient for our learning and salvation that Christ hath left here with us; so that I believe we need no unwritten verities with which to rule His Church.” All who witnessed her noble martyrdom were impressed and inspired by the courage of this beautiful woman who gladly gave her life for Christ of one as the truest and purest witnesses of the Gospel of the Christian Church.

“Only let your conduct be worthy of the Gospel of Christ…Stand fast in one spirit, with one mind striving together for the Faith of the Gospel, and not in any way terrified by your adversaries, which is to them a proof of their perdition, but to you of salvation and that from God. For to you it has been granted on behalf of Christ not only to believe in Him, but also to suffer for His sake.” Philippians 1:27 – 29


TOPICS: Apologetics; Evangelical Christian; Theology
KEYWORDS: martyr; reformation
I had never heard of this lady until a friend sent the link to me. I thought some others might like to learn of her too.
1 posted on 06/17/2010 3:53:24 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

Thank you for a very interesting, and inspirational read!


2 posted on 06/17/2010 4:05:55 PM PDT by 21twelve ( UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES MY ARSE: "..now begin the work of remaking America."-Obama, 1/20/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Two things deserve mention...

As I recall torturing a woman on the rack was illegal at that time. Wriothesley was so blind with anger he broke the king's law.

Second, again, as I recall they did put a bag of gunpowder around her neck as an act of mercy. Funny way of showing mercy, I know, but given what happened to some of the reformers (read: Jan Hus) that was a much better way to go.

3 posted on 06/17/2010 4:10:50 PM PDT by MAexile (Bats left, votes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

Her prosecution and execution where featured in the latest episode of The Tudors on Showtime.


4 posted on 06/17/2010 4:18:05 PM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Okay...I confessed I'm a fan of The Tudors on Showtime.:o)

The case of Anne Askew was part of the episode this last Sunday night. Chancellor Wriothesley and Bishop Gardiner were shown participating in the rack torture of Anne in an attempt to force her to name Queen Catherine Parr (Henry VIII's sixth wife) as a heretic. She would not name anyone and did not denounce her faith. She was a true martyr and the so-called "men of the cloth" that persecuted and murdered her in no way show a true faith and love of Christ. I am SO glad I wasn't born back then and I truly appreciate the freedoms we have in America.

5 posted on 06/17/2010 4:28:53 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
In 1545, Anne was examined by church leaders concerning her beliefs. Her answers were full of wisdom and quotes from the Holy Scriptures, and she often out-maneuvered the inquisitors pointing out the contradictions in their own position.

Just as a point of information, Ms. Askew's persecutors were not "inquisitors" (in the strict sense), and they were not Catholics, but Anglicans.

The "Act of Supremacy," declaring Henry VII "Supreme Head of the Church in England," and stating that the Pope had no authority in England, passed Parliament in 1534. Henry died in January of 1547.

Someone (like me, for example) who affirmed the Papacy in England in 1546 would have been executed right alongside Ms. Askew.

6 posted on 06/17/2010 5:28:36 PM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

Thank you for that article Rn! What an uplifting and inspirational story.


7 posted on 06/17/2010 6:06:50 PM PDT by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
All due respect

Just for the record

"She was offered one last chance at a pardon if she would renounce the doctrines of the Reformation and embrace Catholicism."

This title "embrace Catholicism."

"This should read traditionalist before they came up with word anglicanism."

They were not Catholic in 1546. Her husband was Catholic.

She did not believe in the real presence eucharist. Which both Catholic and Anglicanism believed.

So the state church (Anglicanism) killed her. King Henry V111 became the head of the church of england. Thats after he renounced the Church of Rome.So he could marry again.

But he still hated reformation people outside of England.

But what a matryr!

Thanks for Post.

8 posted on 06/17/2010 6:33:08 PM PDT by johngrace (God so loved the world so he gave his only son! Praise Jesus and Hail the Virgin Mary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

“Anne had acquired a copy of the English Bible and had studied it enthusiastically.”

As I understand it, for some reason the Vatican wasn’t really thrilled with the idea of the laity learning to read, especially the Holy Bible. What I have never been able to figure out is....why?


9 posted on 06/17/2010 6:59:54 PM PDT by Grunthor (Getting married, T minus 10 days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
As I understand it, for some reason the Vatican wasn’t really thrilled with the idea of the laity learning to read, especially the Holy Bible.

As I explained above, leave the "Vatican" out of this story. Ms. Askew was tried by Anglicans and executed by Anglicans for not being sufficiently Anglican.

10 posted on 06/17/2010 7:46:25 PM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AU72

Is that series for sale?? I do not get HBO.. but I heard the series was great


11 posted on 06/18/2010 3:54:02 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Campion

Thank you, the theme of the article made it sound as if it was Catholics that did this.


12 posted on 06/18/2010 6:46:20 AM PDT by Grunthor (Getting married, T minus 10 days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson