Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mormon Doctrine enjoyed a long, controversial history
Ogden Standard-Examiner ^ | June 3, 2010 | Doug Gibson

Posted on 06/04/2010 6:32:21 AM PDT by Colofornian

“Mormon Doctrine” is finally going out of print. The late apostle Bruce R. McConkie’s interpretation of LDS theology was a common sight in the homes of active Mormons for decades. Even today, it’s often seen in the homes of older Mormons. In fact, it will likely be decades before the book becomes difficult to find in used bookstores or ebay, etc.

Peggy Fletcher Stack of the Salt Lake Tribune wrote an excellent article about the “popular but polarizing” “Mormon Doctrine.” McConkie’s book was written as an authoritative index of beliefs, but in truth it caused much controversy; in fact as much from outside critics as within the hierarchy of the Mormon Church. The first edition of “Mormon Doctrine” — and a copy of that must be considered rare — prompted the LDS leadership to propose more than 1,000 changes. Eventually, in the early 1960s, McConkie revised “Mormon Doctrine”...

Nevertheless, as an active Mormon who grew up in the 1960s, 70s and early 80s, I can attest that the many times I or others had a dispute on theology, “Mormon Doctrine” was the first place we went to check and see who was “right.”

According to Fletcher Stack’s article, a key problem with the first edition was severe attacks on the Roman Catholic Church. Later problems with the book were its content regarding blacks. In early editions, McConkie had stated a reversal of denying the priesthood to blacks would never occur. And “even in the most recent edition … McConkie wrote that God cursed Cain with ‘a mark of dark skin, and he became the ancestor of the black race,’” writes Fletcher Stack.

In recent years, the Mormon Church has become public relations conscious...

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.standard.net ...


TOPICS: Apologetics; History; Other Christian; Theology
KEYWORDS: beck; glennbeck; lds; mcconkie; mormon; mormondoctrine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-274 next last
To: svcw

You can page Salvation or NYer for that I am not in the mood/energy to point out what us Catholic FR members get ignorantly slammed by.


21 posted on 06/04/2010 7:24:47 AM PDT by Global2010 ( I can't wait untill Lent comes in 2011.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Paragon Defender

HEY! When are you going to apologize for calling honest people LIARS and DECEIVERS!!!


22 posted on 06/04/2010 7:25:00 AM PDT by SZonian (We began as a REPUBLIC, a nation of laws. We became a DEMOCRACY, majority rules. Next step is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

[i]”I think people here should concentrate on posting uplifting articles.”[/i]

Wow what an idea! Don’t hold your breath though. The anti-Mormon gang has taken over this joint.


23 posted on 06/04/2010 7:25:17 AM PDT by Paragon Defender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Thurston_Howell_III

I agree Lovey.


24 posted on 06/04/2010 7:25:56 AM PDT by Global2010 ( I can't wait untill Lent comes in 2011.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

That’s funny.


25 posted on 06/04/2010 7:27:10 AM PDT by svcw (Habakkuk 2:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Global2010

On FR if someone makes a post, you’re free to respond to it. You don’t have to be “invited”, but I appreciate your courtesy.

I give them kudos as well, but it doesn’t change the fact that their doctrine is suspect.


26 posted on 06/04/2010 7:27:16 AM PDT by SZonian (We began as a REPUBLIC, a nation of laws. We became a DEMOCRACY, majority rules. Next step is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Paragon Defender

HEY! When are you going to apologize for calling honest people LIARS and DECEIVERS!!!


27 posted on 06/04/2010 7:27:57 AM PDT by SZonian (We began as a REPUBLIC, a nation of laws. We became a DEMOCRACY, majority rules. Next step is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Paragon Defender; GOP_Lady

Don’t like it, don’t get on the Religion Forum.
Simple really.


28 posted on 06/04/2010 7:28:12 AM PDT by svcw (Habakkuk 2:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SZonian; Thurston_Howell_III; colorcountry; Colofornian; ejonesie22
Thurston_Howell_III Since Apr 5, 2010

I always get a kick out of n00bs who try to manage FR and tell others what to do and how to do it.

29 posted on 06/04/2010 7:30:20 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Big ears ran as the messiah, but is turning out to be just a plain old mess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

Then do it.


30 posted on 06/04/2010 7:31:08 AM PDT by svcw (Habakkuk 2:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Global2010

You made the point, not me. It’s ok, I’ll be on the look out.


31 posted on 06/04/2010 7:32:42 AM PDT by svcw (Habakkuk 2:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: svcw

32 posted on 06/04/2010 7:33:18 AM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

Its like those people who call Limbaugh and tell him how to run his radio show.


33 posted on 06/04/2010 7:33:33 AM PDT by svcw (Habakkuk 2:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Thurston_Howell_III

You’re right, I live in Utah and I have never met a nicer group of people. They make the best neighbors, coworkers, employees.

For the most part they seem very sincere and serious about their religion. It’s really very heartbreaking.


34 posted on 06/04/2010 7:34:27 AM PDT by T Minus Four (Abortion: one dead, one wounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

Sorry, the link to the story didn’t come through, so I have no idea what the picture is about.


35 posted on 06/04/2010 7:34:43 AM PDT by svcw (Habakkuk 2:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: svcw

36 posted on 06/04/2010 7:36:04 AM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: svcw

37 posted on 06/04/2010 7:37:08 AM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Hint: The man on the left is not Mormon. Than man on the right is Mormon.


38 posted on 06/04/2010 7:39:16 AM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
Ok, I have know idea what these pictures are about without the links or explanation.
39 posted on 06/04/2010 7:39:34 AM PDT by svcw (Habakkuk 2:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

Ok, so? The point is?


40 posted on 06/04/2010 7:39:58 AM PDT by svcw (Habakkuk 2:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-274 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson