Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Once saved always saved... (aka OSAS) the Religion of the anit LDS)
Yecheadquarters Creation ^ | 2010

Posted on 05/25/2010 10:14:07 PM PDT by restornu

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 next last
To: restornu

the children of the Lord have ears to hear and eyes to see to know the things of the Lord and to grasp the Parables of the Lord.
______________________________________________

THen why dont they do just that ???

Why are they reading garbage like the book of mormon ???


121 posted on 05/26/2010 7:17:28 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: restornu

what is an a nit LDS? :-)
__________________________________

How big are you Resty ???

Stand up...

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm

100 pounds wet...

Yeah youre a nit LSD...

err LDS


122 posted on 05/26/2010 7:19:07 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: restornu
So would I, but you know, being self taught I could not afford them!:)

You wave that 'self taught' banner around alot. Could it be you are using it as an excuse to not have come up with an actual reply?

123 posted on 05/26/2010 7:20:14 PM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: restornu

Every “religion” repeats the same basic line, “do this and you will be ok.” Mormonism is just the same as every other religion except for biblical Christianity. ONLY the Gospel comes slamming into our religious pretentiousness and says “you can do NOTHING. You are ruined. You are eaten up with sin, pride arrogance and rebellion against God. You have never had a righteous thought since the day you were born, and you only dig a deeper hole for yourself every day.” Anyone who claims the motivation to obey comes from the fear of punishment just shows they have “fallen from grace” in the sense that they don’t understand the gospel in the first place. The reason is that they don’t understand the righteousness standard of God in the first place. They want to scale it down, emasculate it, strip it down to some silly surface moralism confined to basic honesty in transactions, not swearing, keeping your pants up, no drunkenness, etc etc., maybe add some religious activities. This appeals to lost men in the only way they knows how to approach God. It is uncertainty and doubt and self effort, with an eye to the approving eye of men.

The problem is that this is a FLAT DENIAL of the whole sermon on the mount, Jesus deliberately and systematically destroys our “righteousness” beginning in the first beatitude. He says “blessed are the POOR IN SPIRIT.” The beginning of understanding the gospel is knowing you LACK. As long as one imagines they have something to bring to the table, they are not POOR. Again, one who claims they bring ANYTHING to the table (including your own obedience) argues with Jesus. He is the one who stated that you MUST be “perfect, as your Heavenly Father is perfect.” Not relatively good, not mostly obedient, not submissive, PERFECT.

Again, the ONLY way a man can claim to have lived in a way so as not to sin his way out of relationship with God is to RE-DEFINE sin to some pathetic set of external commands.

The problem with that view is that such a person DOES NOT see himself or herself as ruined, helpless, and utterly without hope without an alien righteousness given them. Instead they will settle for a slopover of moralistic religiosity and will actively resist the idea of a total cleansing from the inside out. It is much more comfortable to claim that Jesus dusts us off and rearranges a few of the more lurid details of our lives. We call that kind of person a PHARISEE in first century Palestine. We call them churchgoers, and certainly Mormons, nowadays. This whole sorry mess requires a man-centered view of sin, and thus a man-centered view of God.

Again, when Jesus came, he declared himself at war FIRST OF ALL with the religious community and told the religious moralists that they were equally if not more damned than the irreligious for precisely this reason. They proved him right by joining with the irreligious to murder him. This is always the response of the moralist in the end. They hate the true God, though they will speak warmly of a “God” they have invented, who looks benevolently on their good works.

Self-righteousness may even use the word “grace” and then redefine it to mean something other than a completely free and undeserved gift to people who cannot either deserve nor keep it on their own. When they come face to face with the relentless nature of the claims of grace as it is in the bible, though they hated it. Always have, always will.


124 posted on 05/26/2010 7:24:25 PM PDT by AK_47_7.62x39 (There are many moderate Muslims, but there is no such thing as a moderate Islam. -- Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AK_47_7.62x39
Well I do recall this verse you might have read it or heard about it

Phil 2

10 That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth;

11 And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. ( of Jesus Christ)

12 Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.

13 For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure.

14 Do all things without murmurings and disputings:

15 That ye may be blameless and harmless, the sons of God, without rebuke, in the midst of a crooked and perverse nation, among whom ye shine as lights in the world;

16 Holding forth the word of life; that I may rejoice in the day of Christ, that I have not run in vain, neither laboured in vain.

125 posted on 05/26/2010 7:50:46 PM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: restornu

Yes. My bible also has a chapter 3 of Philippians, as well as a second chapter. Do you recall how Paul talks about all his righteousness? He uses a peculiar word for it.

My view of the bible is that you reconcile these passages rather than pick one and assume that it “refutes” the others.


126 posted on 05/26/2010 8:04:11 PM PDT by AK_47_7.62x39 (There are many moderate Muslims, but there is no such thing as a moderate Islam. -- Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: AK_47_7.62x39

My view of the bible is that you reconcile these passages rather than pick one and assume that it “refutes” the others.

***

It is not that some of these passages contradicts another it depends on situation how it is being applied and yet at the same time may seem inconsistant for me when that happens is the moment to pray over it for clarification the Holy Ghost has always enlighten my mind for a clearer understanding.


127 posted on 05/26/2010 8:13:34 PM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

That is a new one Pan_Yan,

...but what did I expect being between rocks and hard places that all of you love to forge and are so quick to damn if I do, and damn if I don’t!


128 posted on 05/26/2010 8:56:33 PM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: restornu

Odd how you resort to ‘making it personal’ when backed into a doctrinal corner, but never hesitate to make your insults personal and the Mod just lets you slide.


129 posted on 05/26/2010 9:00:38 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

If you read carefully I used you as in plural!

all of you!


130 posted on 05/26/2010 9:04:10 PM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Post 128 pushes the envelope, but it is not "making it personal" because it is reading the mind of a group - not an individual Freeper.

If you see a post which you believe is making it personal, ping me or send me a Freepmail.

131 posted on 05/26/2010 9:05:27 PM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

BTW even though Pan_Yam wife gives me a hard time I really like her!


132 posted on 05/26/2010 9:07:52 PM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

Sorry confused Pan_Yam wife with Pan_Yam.


133 posted on 05/26/2010 9:09:36 PM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator

Thanks but no thanks.


134 posted on 05/26/2010 9:16:25 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

The Catholic Church doesn’t consider mormonism to be a Christian religion. They will, however take your money and do good things with it.
___________________________________

and feed and clothe people ...

unlike the mormons who use the money to build monumentsa to themselves...


135 posted on 05/26/2010 9:26:08 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns

If it were between Christians, fine. But having BEEN LDS, I know how they operate. They use minor points of doctrine as proof of the ‘apostasy’. That was the point of this thread.

Been there, done that, God freed me. But I do remember how they operate.


136 posted on 05/26/2010 9:32:26 PM PDT by reaganaut (Ex-mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

Amen. Unfortuantely, the LDS teach that we have to ‘pay Jesus back’ for His sacrifice by OUR works.


137 posted on 05/26/2010 9:33:14 PM PDT by reaganaut (Ex-mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut

>>> They use minor points of doctrine as proof of the ‘apostasy’. That was the point of this thread.

Well, the point is well made.

However, if they are attempting to point out such a large rift using this issue, they fail to recognize that osas is a very small minority among all of the main line traditional Christian denominations. Even the Pentecostal denominations adhere to the non-osas doctrin. I am not aware of any main stream denomination besides Baptists who teach osas.

Most Christians on both sides of the fence unfortunately DO seem to treat this issue as a minor point. I do not... and that was my point.

What separates us from them though, is that we are not afraid of sharpening a little iron over this... and what they intend to use for weakening us actually strengthens us.


138 posted on 05/26/2010 10:13:38 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut

“Unfortuantely, the LDS teach that we have to ‘pay Jesus back’ for His sacrifice by OUR works.”

As if we could EVER be that good.


139 posted on 05/27/2010 6:27:44 AM PDT by Grunthor (Faster than the speed of smell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

They think they can.


140 posted on 05/27/2010 7:01:55 AM PDT by reaganaut (Ex-mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson