Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Godzilla
Sorry, you have your explaination mixed up historically. It was the anti-Trinitarian teachings of Arius that was upsetting the apple cart so to speak. Trinitarian teachings are present in ANF writings over a hundred years prior to Nicea.

_____________________________________________

I didn't say they were non-existant, they were not popular.

12 posted on 05/24/2010 8:56:41 AM PDT by JAKraig (Surely my religion is at least as good as yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: JAKraig
I didn't say they were non-existant, they were not popular.

Again, history says otherwise. Arianism only appeared with Arius. Prior to that it was the teaching of the Trinity that was within the core of orthoxy - by your definition - it was popular. Prior to Arius were the various gnostic sects that attempted to appropriate Christianity as its own with their aberant teaching on God. Gnosticism never gained traction within orthodox Christian teachings - never 'popular' by your definition.

So if Trinitarism was not 'popular' cite sources for what WAS more popular then.

13 posted on 05/24/2010 9:02:16 AM PDT by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson