LOL by who? Catholic historians that have a vested (or vestment) issue in making Peter at he Bishop of Rome?? The time line does not work out when correlated to Acts, scripture tells us that was NOT Peters ministry , there is NO HARD historical evidence ,History also informs us of the sharp debates between Ultramontanism and Gallicanism; also from the Councils of Constance, Basle, Florence, Pisa (the time of the antipopes) it becomes evident that the Roman church was undecided who held the supremacy, whether it was the pope or an ecumenical council. that he was ever bishop of Rome but the church says so it MUST BE SO ...
Sola Ecclesia Romanus
Only the Church of Rome is the Rule of Faith
Of course go by the 1st church of your own decision on your own translation 5,000.000 ways to Sunday. Enjoy!