Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: netmilsmom

“Who does?”

The post I was responding to does. The doctrines of men and demon it is based on does.


287 posted on 05/07/2010 10:14:54 AM PDT by Outership (Looking for a line by line Book of Revelation Bible study? http://tiny.cc/rPSQc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]


To: Outership; Mad Dawg

Mad Dawg? Are you saying that Mad Dawg puts Mary above Christ?


291 posted on 05/07/2010 10:21:32 AM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Ilk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies ]

To: Outership
Okay. Let's take it carefully.

You wrote
The Word never intended for anyone to even come up with the idea that Christ’s mother was to be elevated above Christ.

When I asked, "Who does?" you answered:
The post I was responding to does.

Here's the entire post. Would you be so kind as to show me exactly where it elevates Mary above Christ?

It's all very well to take recourse to the usual litany of accusations centered around rubber, but if the general charge is not reduced and clearly related to the specific thing you are complaining about, then it just passes me by.

Is the mother of the head NOT the mother of the Body?
Is Mary NOT the mother of Jesus the Christ?
Is the Church NOT the Body of which Christ is the head?
I don't see the wildness or the rubber.

In related news, I am astonished the a psychologist questions the bonding of infant with mother as important in the development of the ability to love.


296 posted on 05/07/2010 10:27:10 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (O Maria, sine labe concepta, ora pro nobis qui ad te confugimus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson