Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Card. Castrillon-Hoyos Out At Latin Mass - Breaking
cmr ^ | April 21, 2010

Posted on 04/21/2010 9:56:09 AM PDT by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: Dajjal
I would appreciate any information you could tell me about how/when to attend one of these Masses.

Is this anywhere close to you? http://www.parishes.org/marymothergod.html
41 posted on 04/21/2010 3:27:14 PM PDT by mlizzy ("Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person" --Mother Teresa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

Thanks! I’m usin’ that!


42 posted on 04/21/2010 3:52:02 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Pray (Pray!) Oh yes we Pray (Pray!)-- You've Got to Pray Just to Make it Today. --MC Hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

LOL! Sam wouldn’t mind. He was quite a character, difficult in some aspects but a true and loyal friend to those who could put up with his quirks. I would have liked to have met him.


43 posted on 04/21/2010 4:00:42 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: mlizzy
Is this anywhere close to you?

Thanks. I know about those Masses.

I'm trying to find out when the non-advertised Traditional Masses are said at the Shrine.

44 posted on 04/21/2010 6:25:16 PM PDT by Dajjal (Justice Robert Jackson was wrong -- the Constitution IS a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
This Bishop (or any priest) is absolutely obligated NOT to discuss with ANYONE, ANYTHING he has heard in confession.

That isn't exactly true. He can't discuss anything that would identify an individual penitent or associate that individual penitent with a specific sin. He can make general statements about the confessions he hears as a group, but not specific statements about what specific individuals have told him.

45 posted on 04/21/2010 6:43:34 PM PDT by Campion ("President Barack Obama" is an anagram for "An Arab-backed imposter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
If you have the time, could you explain to me (in simple language) what the obligation of a confessor is if a penitent confesses something which is dangerous, a crime, and likely to lead to more dangers to others, and more crimes?

There's a classic old Alfred Hitchcock movie about this theme, called I Confess.

The priest can make going to the police a condition of absolution. However, he cannot do or say anything that would tie a particular sin (or anything else said in confession) to a particular penitent.

(It would seem to me that in some circumstances he could attempt to deflect suspicion from someone he knew to be innocent, since that's not necessarily tying a sin to a particular penitent. He just couldn't say anything more about how he had acquired that information.)

As has been pointed out, in a traditional confessional setting, the priest often does not know the identity of the penitent anyway, since he or she is behind a screen.

46 posted on 04/21/2010 6:55:34 PM PDT by Campion ("President Barack Obama" is an anagram for "An Arab-backed imposter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dajjal
Thanks. I know about those Masses. I'm trying to find out when the non-advertised Traditional Masses are said at the Shrine.

I hope you find them; I love the Tridentine and the Novus Ordo Latin as well. We've been attending them since the first of the year.
47 posted on 04/21/2010 7:57:35 PM PDT by mlizzy ("Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person" --Mother Teresa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Very good.


48 posted on 04/22/2010 6:08:48 AM PDT by Hieronymus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

I have always thought that there was more to this story than the press reports.....

I am praying for the Cardinal and for the truth to come to the light.


49 posted on 04/22/2010 6:14:25 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp
I can understand the Cardinal giving the Bishop support for not turning the priest over, if it were later discovered that the Bishop had discovered the abuse while administering the Sacrament of Penance. However, that distinction will be lost or ignored in any media reports about the matter, and if the Cardinal were to be the celebrant, the Mass would be 'tainted', if you will, by the continual references to the letter.

Much as the Cardinal's actions might have been canonically correct, we have to look past that sometimes, because we're dealing with a media situation here, whether we like it, or not. I'm sure there is someone else the Vatican can find to do the Latin Mass in honor of the Pope's fifth anniversary in the Pontificate.

50 posted on 04/22/2010 11:09:43 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: outpostinmass2
The transfer of Cardinal Law to Rome is most troubling. Law should have been defrocked and he should have faced criminal prosecution.

Cardinal Law never molested anyone, so he couldn't have been arrested, tried, or convicted of a crime. Therefore, he shouldn't have been 'defrocked', because he never committed a crime. Even after his extensive testimony, in which he accepted responsibility for not being more responsive to the matters, which were actually handled by his Auxiliary Bishops, there was never any legal accusation against him.

The District Attorney was HOPING there would be something with which to charge Cardinal Law, and he even stated plainly, after the hearings, that he wished he could have found something. THAT tells me that they this was planned to be a media circus that would damage the credibility of the Church when speaking on other issues, most specifically homosexual marriage, which was making its way up to the Supreme Judicial Court. The Church was the most outspoken opponent to homosexual marriage, but after the abuse scandal broke, any statement the Church made was accompanied by a comment about the priest abuse, so credibility WAS lost.

Cardinal Law resigned, and, if I'm not mistaken, he is the ONLY Bishop, Archbishop or Cardinal in charge of a Diocese that has had these cases, who HAS resigned. He was in the States for over a year before being reassigned to Rome

51 posted on 04/22/2010 11:24:15 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
That's one of the reasons why actual spoken confession is so important: it helps the half-assed half-penitent expose his actions in an objective way, and maybe hear "for himself" how deluded he has really been.

LOL! That's the best description of Confession I think I've ever heard!

We humans have an enormous propensity for self-justification, and it's only when confronted, and we have to look at our souls in the mirror of the Confessional, if you will, that we can really admit to ourselves what we've done.

52 posted on 04/22/2010 11:28:59 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

What Cardinal Law did was look the other way. He new crimes were taking place and innocent children were being raped and he did nothing. From the evidence I saw he did not care. Some leader he was. The church certainly has a low threshold for defrocking. The media didn’t create this mess.


53 posted on 04/22/2010 12:23:45 PM PDT by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

Cardinal Roger Mahony of Los Angelos recently resigned. Cardinal Seán Brady of Ireland will be resigning soon.


54 posted on 04/22/2010 12:29:51 PM PDT by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: outpostinmass2
Law ... should have faced criminal prosecution.

Just for the record, he testified before a grand jury and the grand jury chose not to indict him.

55 posted on 04/22/2010 12:30:52 PM PDT by Campion ("President Barack Obama" is an anagram for "An Arab-backed imposter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Campion

Only because at the time Massachusetts had no law requiring the reporting of a crime. Crazy but true. It is still no excuse that Law is still a leader in the church living it up in Rome. That is a big problem for the church.


56 posted on 04/22/2010 12:39:08 PM PDT by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: outpostinmass2

This has since changed.

http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/119-51a.htm

Today he Law would be in jail for not reporting child rape.


57 posted on 04/22/2010 12:47:57 PM PDT by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson