Judith Anne posted her opus, begged to be banned, was not banned, and is now again posting on FR.
It is all a matter of record. In fact I am pinging GRPL secretary/historian Alex Murphy to chime in with the date/time of those posts.
Why does post #2476 refer all the way back to post #3? How curious.
And those neverending link files are not history, they are obsessiveness dressed in HTML.
Is this the face of the Reformed? Post after post seems to illustrate that Reformed doctrine is based not on a positive exposition of Reformed doctrine which one can agree with on doctrinal points, but exists exlusively in the world of the negative: junior-high tactics of ridicule and taunting.
Is this the impression that the Reformed wish to leave on the reader? This thread is an embarrassment to the Reformed, but do any of them realize it?
“...obsessiveness dressed in HTML”
This is one to remember.
Thanks, Lorica