[MarkBsnr]

That's once more than Peter corrected Paul which was zero.

So in the OPC vernacular 'often' means 'once'. Is this correct?

Thus Rome erred when it concocted its fictitious papal government around a disciple who not only denied Christ three times, but who was seriously admonished by Paul for his teaching error.

A single error. Once. And Peter accepted it. The Church continues, individual men err. The Church is the Church of Jesus, Created by Him and Commissioned by the Holy Spirit at Pentecost. The Church is not a church of men, created by a splinter of a splinter of a splinter of a splinter of the decision to walk away from the Church at the Reformation.

But the way of the Roman Catholic apologist is to demand evidence, and once they get that evidence, they demand more evidence. Yadayadayada.

The way of the Catholic apologist is ensure that the definitions of words like 'often' used in antiCatholic posts are correct, and don't mean other things, like 'once'.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

So we have Paul correcting Peter, but Peter never correcting Paul.

Yet RCC apologists diminish Paul, calling him a Gnostic and anti-Trinitarian, while at the same time elevating Peter to unBiblical proportions, misidentifying him "the rock" when Scripture tells us the Lord, Jesus Christ, and His teachings are now and always have been "the only rock."

Got it.