The charge if Gnostic heresy is valid after a complete review of the posting history. Advocating that only through the special knowledge possessed by certain adherants enabled Salvation and all others, regardless of faith or deed were excluded meets the text book definition. But of course, I only have his posts, not his thoughts to assess. However, I do find it ironic that you are attempting to read my mind.
I understand the meaning of the accusation, I just have seen no evidence provided to back up your accusation, Natural Law.
Show me how the poster in question has advocated Gnosticism. If you can, then you are not mind reading. If you can’t, then you are.
It’s really fairly simple and straightforward, no mind reading on my part necessary.